There's an interesting philosophical debate here. Peters seemed to do everything in his power to shore up protection. Adding Tunsil and Connerly is nothing to sneeze at relative to resources. In terms of weapons, Peters definitely went light although he probably imagined a Terry, Deebo, and Noah being a good starting trio. No one really expects to need their fifth and sixth receivers to start for the majority of the season. In hindsight, Deebo probably was the wrong bet. Deebo did okay, but isn't a YAC guy anymore and that was his superpower. A good free agent receiver (or two) would have given him better bang for the buck. As for tight end, I can see why they wanted to roll with Ertz one more year based on the connection him and Daniels had in 2024.
Absolutely but as I mentioned you can walk and chew gum at the same time. the Bears for example both loaded Caleb with weapons and beefed up the O line.
Considering Noah can't stay healthy and wasn't healthy that off season as the kicker -- to bank on him as your Z WR is ridiculous IMO. Even healthy, Brown would be like WR #5 on most teams. He's the #2 here? Keim in his podcast said they had higher hopes for Chris Moore, KJ Osborn and Michael Gallup so I gather the thought was if Brown can't do it Gallup or Osborn would emerge.
But what kind of low level ambition have they got cooking when they are banking on a veteran minimum salaried WR coming off retirment or a dude that was discarded from the WR starved at the time NE? That's why my theory is Peters let the Zaacheus signing go to his head from last year and or just thought hey if Jayden can make lemonade out of lemons from Crowder, Dyami and Zaccheus than why not Chris Moore, KJ Osborn, Michael Gallup?
I actually liked the Deebo trade and still like it. But he's not a traditional WR. He's more of a YAC gadget guy. Deebo is really all Peters did as far as weapons. Deebo arrives and Zaccheus, Dyami, and Crower dg. Is Deebo better than those three? Yep. But the depth got weaker,
If you are serious about loading up your franchise QB you don't fart around with it. NE signs Diggs, A. Hooper, Mack Hoillins, goes to town on the O line, drafts Treveyon Henderson, W. Campbell, Kyle Williams. Spends more than three times the money this team does to improve their defense in FA.
The Bears go even crazier. A team that already has Kmet, they draft Loveland. A team with already D. Moore and Odunze, draft L. Burden. And they take their WR depth seriously including by signing our old friend, Zaccheus.
lol, I'll keep quoting this agent from Standig's agent survey
- “Give them credit for staying focused on rebuilding the roster, but why not be more aggressive with the QB on a rookie deal when you might already be the second-best NFC team? At the very least, they should have filled in some gaps or replaced a few older players. Instead, they have tons of 2026 free agents, meaning in your third year, you're still filling too many holes.”
- “Certainly, the team where a sophomore slump comes to mind.”
I am actually ironically higher on Peters than most fans who are very critical of him. I think Peters has clear strengths. But IMO he needs to have more balls as to shooting for higher risk players. He's proven he's a good value investor, not great, but good. But IMO he needs to be a growth investor if SB is the goal.
What I like:
A. Building the O line is a big deal and its part of my optimism moving forward
B. He'e good with his FA signings -- a lot of hits
C. I think his drafts have been decent even the maligned 2024 one -- my issue with them is the same with FA, I want better than solid players. they need difference makers.