Official Game Thread - Week 2 - Commanders @ Packers - TNF

Agreed on the teams look of the preseason. When there were 4 games even the players you wanted to rest were involved for a couple drives in a couple games. Now that they have dropped the number of games as well as the usage of the starters to a point that the team was in sync. The team did look pretty good last though against a team with a lot of talented players.

The OL and thee QB to WR's definetley time to gel and that was not afforded them. No reason for the OL not to be given more play time together and yes Terry's hold should receive blame. He also needs to be targeted more, that's why he earned that contract.

At the end of the day, I do place a large portion of that awful game on the coaching, something I do not normally do. It was called terribly

I know its sort of an amorphous point, no way to be proved. But I does comes off that this coaching staff-FO were feeling themselves some. Heck Josh Harris said publicly, this is going to be a great game.

I don't think it regsitered with them, that they could be dominated. And look i don't mean it as a shot. I think its natural in sports. Almost all teams go through this where they need to find their edge and in order to get to that point they need some humble pie.

As i mentioned when you watch the America's Game recaps of teams winning SBs, when they interview coaches and players, there is usually some turning point where they got beat and it awakens them in a big away including the Eagles after their slow start last year.

I am not saying this team was overconfident. But when you get on a roll and everyone is sucking up to you and people are talking SB -- and clearly the way this FO approached the off season, they are thinking SB -- you can get a little complacent or lose your edge.

It hurts to lose like they did last night because they were dominated. But in terms of a wakeup call, its a fast forward version of it. If lets say they lost by 1 point or they played well but were foiled by turnovers or name that easy explanation, they can shrug it off. But they can't shrug off what happened yesterday.
 
Cant figure the Eckler "every down back" kind of use out. Love him in 3rd down and quick hitters, dump offs, screens etc (in space). But not the way they used him yesterday.

The only explanation that makes sense to me is pass pro. Maybe Croskey-Merritt is still raw on that front. Otherwise it makes no sense to me.
 
I think Conerly is following in the tradition of Scherff and Cosmi - drafted to play RT, but ultimately suited to be a guard. I think Coleman and Conerly will switch roles, with Coleman back to OT, and Conerly playing guard on the left side.
Amos and Lane were the bright spots last night.
 
Let’s not forget that Conerly is but 21 years old. A boy against men in the NFL at this point. Doesn’t look like he should be a starter yet. Losing Bates only exasperated his situation.
 
We all saw the difference in coaching. Green Bay has one of the best HC's in all of football meanwhile we have a reject that has already failed once.

The talent is getting there but I don't think we have the HC that puts you over the top.
 
We all saw the difference in coaching. Green Bay has one of the best HC's in all of football meanwhile we have a reject that has already failed once.

The talent is getting there but I don't think we have the HC that puts you over the top.

I get the frustration, but after last year... it's massively premature to go there 🤷‍♂️
 
I think Conerly is following in the tradition of Scherff and Cosmi - drafted to play RT, but ultimately suited to be a guard. I think Coleman and Conerly will switch roles, with Coleman back to OT, and Conerly playing guard on the left side.
Amos and Lane were the bright spots last night.

Conerly will be a good starting tackle in this league. It just sucks that the he has had to go against a couple Pro Bowlers / All Pros in his career. Unfortunately for him, he gets Crosby next weem.

First round rookie tackles tend to suck and they start figuring things out later in the year.

Conerly should be starting but I also think he should be trading series with Wylie similar to how Coleman traded series with Lucas last season. I think it’s a way to ramp him faster and protect his confidence by allowing him do and then watch and then do and then watcg
 
We all saw the difference in coaching. Green Bay has one of the best HC's in all of football meanwhile we have a reject that has already failed once.

The talent is getting there but I don't think we have the HC that puts you over the top.
As Discobob said, I get the frustration, but 1 loss wiping out an NFC Championship appearance and the turnaround from 4 wins to 12*… I mean, that’s certainly a take 😊.

*(and that’s leaving out a ton of other factors that were overcome)
 
We all saw the difference in coaching. Green Bay has one of the best HC's in all of football meanwhile we have a reject that has already failed once.

The talent is getting there but I don't think we have the HC that puts you over the top.

I totally get this, I live in ATL and will never forget that travesty. 28-3 is kinda just a point of life/laughter here now.

I get the frustration, but after last year... it's massively premature to go there 🤷‍♂️

It's actually not, based on the above massive failure. He had a one-off season once before, then got run outta DALLASS of all places. I give him no quarter.
 
People are being over the top. we played on a short week against one of the best teams in the NFL at their home. Even as bad as we played we could have had a chance all the way till half way thru the 4th quarter. We lost a game that we would lose pribably 9 times out of 10.
 
People are being over the top. we played on a short week against one of the best teams in the NFL at their home. Even as bad as we played we could have had a chance all the way till half way thru the 4th quarter. We lost a game that we would lose pribably 9 times out of 10.
Dang, I get why we were considered the games underdog but I never thought we would lose 9 out of 10 times.

I especially say that knowing we were going into the game very healthy and they had a few important injuries.

I expected the team to be better prepared as they stated spending time focusing on this game prior to the Giants game.
 
Dang, I get why we were considered the games underdog but I never thought we would lose 9 out of 10 times.

I especially say that knowing we were going into the game very healthy and they had a few important injuries.

I expected the team to be better prepared as they stated spending time focusing on this game prior to the Giants game.
Short week, In Green Bay, with them having at least a top 3 Defense. We played the Giants very poorly but we would come and Beat GB in their house. Me personally id expect them to win that battle 9 out of 10 times. We have gotten better. But we also have kinks to work out. Working the kinks out on a short week. Did we even practice? I dont know man. People expect way too much.
 
I totally get this, I live in ATL and will never forget that travesty. 28-3 is kinda just a point of life/laughter here now.



It's actually not, based on the above massive failure. He had a one-off season once before, then got run outta DALLASS of all places. I give him no quarter.
“Run out of Dallas”? That’s an interesting way of looking at it.
 
How worried should we be that Green Bay gave the league the blueprint to contain Jayden? Maybe it wouldn’t work without their high level talent, but they shut him down like we’ve never seen.
 
How worried should we be that Green Bay gave the league the blueprint to contain Jayden? Maybe it wouldn’t work without their high level talent, but they shut him down like we’ve never seen.
Teams have been trying to focus on preventing him from getting to his right and typically fail. The Packers though are too stout - tough up front and fast, disciplined LBs. Most teams don’t have that luxury.

But in order to be the cream of the crop, you have to have horses too. We simply don’t have them, and not real sure how we can acquire them even next year - given the void in talent Ron left behind.
 
I know there's a lot of luck in getting turnovers, but we're still sitting at 0 takeaways so far. Bummer
 
As Discobob said, I get the frustration, but 1 loss wiping out an NFC Championship appearance and the turnaround from 4 wins to 12*… I mean, that’s certainly a take 😊.

*(and that’s leaving out a ton of other factors that were overcome)

We got lucky several times last year and won despite coaching. Imagine if this team had LaFlaur, McVay, O'Connell, or Reid as its HC.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 3, Members: 0, Guests: 3)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top