Washington Redskins Football Team Commanders History Discussion Thread

Voice_of_Reason

The Franchise Player
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Top Monthly Contributor
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
4,558
Reaction score
5,378
Points
543
Given a number of threads seem to be derailed at times because somebody (often me) will bring up a comparison from the past, and then we start going down the road discussing that topic, and derail the thread.

So, this is a place to discuss all of the things which happened before, previous owners, coaches, GMs, players, whatever you want to discuss about something that happened in the past which does not effect the current team, this is a place for that discussion.

Any topic is valid. I'm sure a lot of them will tend to the more recent past, so the Dan Snyder years, but if anybody wants to talk about games from the 80's, the Gibbs years, Bobby Beathard's drafts, that's all cool too.

The one which were just discussing are some of the most boneheaded signings Dan Snyder made or draft picks Dan forced, and what the beginning of the end was for Snyder.

Anyway, have at it. If anybody wants to continue the conversation from the Training Camp thread, go for it.
 
My last comment on this and then dropping this because it's completely off-topic, but I think George was by far the worst of all of them. There were certainly others. But George was the first where Dan brought in a player to replace a pro-bowler.

The other one which is in the same vane was Deion. Who I despise with ever fiber of my being. Most of the others were just guys they brought in and overpaid, or Dan drafted because of "reasons."

But George was a special type of terrible.

I remember this all too well and I agree completely, forcing Jeff George to replace Brad Johnson was the worst and an omen of things to come.

That 2000 season was sad to see after a very good 1999 team finished one botched field goal short of the NFC Championship game. Brad Johnson went 7-4 and Jeff George went 1-4. Norv still had a winning record when Dan fired him before the end of the season. Horrible leadership.

I don’t think Dan Snyder ever lived that down. Brad Johnson would go on to win a Super Bowl, and if it weren’t for Joe Gibbs, Dan would never win another playoff game in his tenure. Not to get religious, but I’m so glad to be rid of his bad karma.
 
I remember this all too well and I agree completely, forcing Jeff George to replace Brad Johnson was the worst and an omen of things to come.

That 2000 season was sad to see after a very good 1999 team finished one botched field goal short of the NFC Championship game. Brad Johnson went 7-4 and Jeff George went 1-4. Norv still had a winning record when Dan fired him before the end of the season. Horrible leadership.

I don’t think Dan Snyder ever lived that down. Brad Johnson would go on to win a Super Bowl, and if it weren’t for Joe Gibbs, Dan would never win another playoff game in his tenure. Not to get religious, but I’m so glad to be rid of his bad karma.
Actually, Snyder wore the 2000 badge of "overspend in free agency" for the remainder of his ownership.

I criticized him plenty, but he had 2 REALLY bad times when they went in and did stupid things in free agency were 2000 and 2006. The rest of the overspending was mostly run-of-the-mill stupid, but those two off-seasons were REALLY stupid.

However, all that stopped and the pendulum swung to the entire opposite direction for the final 12 years of his ownership: they barely spent money on any FAs. You can count on one hand the high-priced FAs they signed after 2010: Pierre Garcon, Josh Norman, and that other one I can't remember which didn't work out. I think maybe another cornerback? But there weren't a lot. They became super cheap.

But Dan carried the "overspend in FA" from 2000 until he sold the team.

He also carried the "fires coaches all the time" as well, which wasn't actually true. Depending on your view of Norv, he fired either one or two coaches too soon:
1. Norv - in-season during the 2000 season with a winning record. I personally think Norv was a bum, so don't care so much.
2. Marty - after one 8-8 season and finished with an 8-3 run.

The others?
- Spurrier quit. Dan would have been stupid enough to bring him back after "5-11, not so good." But Spurrier quit.
- Gibbs retired again.
- Zorn needed firing
- Shanahan is a tough case, but he got 4 years and had 3 losing seasons. So, at the very least, it wasn't a rush to judgement.
- Jay, Bruce's nepo-baby, should never have been hired, but he was given 6+ seasons of gross incompetence before being fired.

And Dan didn't fire Ron, Josh did.

So, the national media picked up this theme of "Dan fires coaches every year" and really, after the first 2 years of his ownership, the only coach he fired after less than 4 years was Zorn.

None of this absolves Dan from anything. He was an absolutely horrendous owner. My problem was much more with the national media which is generally stupid and lazy, and just carried these narratives on for ages when they hadn't been true in close to 20 years when they were barking about them in the 2020's. Go find some actual things to write about which are happening and are atrocious.

Anyway, this has been a bee in my bonnet for a while.
 
Heinicke was a great Stockholm Syndrom story. His arm is what influenced the playcalling, and Rivera's instistance of playing it back with Heinicke instead of giving Howell more than one game was a costly waste. Scott Turner wasn't amazing by any means, but he never got the credit he deserved for gameplanning around a QB who threw lame ducks past 20 yards.

View attachment 12204

*** quoted from Preseason thread - moving discussion here ***


I dont know if i agree with this.

In 2022 Heinicke ranked 11th in 'Intended Air Yards per Attempt'. That's 11th in the NFL. The offense wasn't exactly changed to suit Taylor's strength. He was asked to do more than he was capable of.

View attachment 12219
 
*** quoted from Preseason thread - moving discussion here ***


I dont know if i agree with this.

In 2022 Heinicke ranked 11th in 'Intended Air Yards per Attempt'. That's 11th in the NFL. The offense wasn't exactly changed to suit Taylor's strength. He was asked to do more than he was capable of.

View attachment 12219
The road to losing to Daniel Jones in back-to-back games with a bye week in between is paved with good intended air yards.

Intending to throw it deep doesn't make up for the fact that every deep throw was a lame duck. The intentions were good when McLauren got a concussion trying to catch one of those lame ducks. The intentions were good when a referee played 12th man on the field against the Vikings to break up the third man in a throw into triple coverage,, but that couldn't be counted on very often.

Heinicke's inability to get the ball downfield in a timely manner (not his fault that he didn't have the arm strength, but neither is it the rest of the team's fault) made it easy for teams to lock down our offense. Aside from admitting total defeat and scheming so that no receiver even travels beyond the 20 yard mark, there's nothing an offensive coordinator can do to prevent a QB from choosing to throw the ball where he wants to, even if it's out of his range.
 
Last edited:
The road to losing to Daniel Jones in back-to-back games with a bye week in between is paved with good intended air yards.

Intending to throw it deep doesn't make up for the fact that every deep throw was a lame duck. The intentions were good when McLauren got a concussion trying to catch one of those lame ducks. The intentions were good when a referee played 12th man on the field against the Vikings to break up the third man in a throw into triple coverage,, but that couldn't be counted on very often.

Heinicke's inability to get the ball downfield in a timely manner (not his fault that he didn't have the arm strength, but neither is it the rest of the team's fault) made it easy for teams to lock down our offense. Aside from admitting total defeat and scheming so that no receiver even travels beyond the 20 yard mark, there's nothing an offensive coordinator can do to prevent a QB from choosing to throw the ball where he wants to, even if it's out of his range.


huh?

Your post said that Turner catered an offense to Heinicke, and that essentially he doesn't get a fair shake for that. All i was saying was that Turner wasn't exactly doing Heinicke any favors because he was still asking him to do something he was incapable of, and the metrics bear that out. That despite the entire world knowing Heinicke couldn't do it, Turner still asked him to. It's likely that the only reason players were open down field is because the DBs and defense knew they could 'let' it happen and have time to recover. Turner ignored that and still asked him to throw it down field.
 
huh?

Your post said that Turner catered an offense to Heinicke, and that essentially he doesn't get a fair shake for that. All i was saying was that Turner wasn't exactly doing Heinicke any favors because he was still asking him to do something he was incapable of, and the metrics bear that out. That despite the entire world knowing Heinicke couldn't do it, Turner still asked him to. It's likely that the only reason players were open down field is because the DBs and defense knew they could 'let' it happen and have time to recover. Turner ignored that and still asked him to throw it down field.
I disagree that Turner asked him to. Scheming to have 1 or 2 out of 5 receivers down field was an attempt to open up the part of the field that Heinicke could reliably work in. Otherwise, every defensive player could camp the first 20 yards and never have to move. Heinicke had the ball in his hands and made the decision himself on whether to throw it deep or not.

There was no right way to make Heinicke work. Turner tried anyway, and beyond a handful of games with a burned out Wentz, half a season with Peg Leg Smith, a handful of games with Kyle Smith (who I think was the most complete QB the team had, which says a lot for how destitute the team was at QB) and one game with Howell, he never got a decent shot at running a real offense. Heinicke got the fans' and players' love, Turner got the flak.

I wouldn't have it any other way since going from Turner to Bieniemy did a lot to help sink the team, but I remain convinced that Turner did a decent job with the tools he was provided. I won't die on this hill, but I will still plant my flag on it.
 
Last edited:
At some point the coaches have to coach also. And don't get me wrong, I was 100% in favor of having the occasional deep ball just to 'keep the defense honest," but if Terry, who is your no. 1 WR, is a decoy to avoid the defenses camping, then that is even worse than just telling him to chuck it. That would mean you're basically taking your best offensive weapon and designing them as a decoy.

Heinicke got the fans and players love because he was a clearly overmatched, and he laid it all on the line... The team played noticeably different when he was on the field. It was obvious that the effort level changed.
 
  1. The reason I use [REDACTED] to speak of Heinicke is because whenever he is mentioned, exactly what happens, happened: emotional response. So it became habit.
  2. He was terrible in just about every possible definition of terrible. He made late decisions, threw interceptions, and didn't have the arm strength to reach the sidelines.
  3. He owes Terry half of his income, because without Terry making Herculean effort plays, Taylor doesn't complete any passes outside a 10 yard box from where the ball is snapped.
  4. I don't blame Heinicke. He "fought his guts out." But he should never have been in a position to ever play. He had his one magical game against Tampa in the playoffs. That should have been it.
  5. When he went down to Atlanta, he couldn't beat out Riddler, then when Riddler sucked so much, they put Heinicke in, he sucked so much more they had to go back to Riddler.
  6. He's just a terrible QB. Good dude. Lots of heart. Just a terrible QB
  7. More annoying that anything were the group of fans who just wouldn't stop about him being worth giving a shot to. He wasn't worth giving a shot to. And they droned on and on about how he was cheap and why not just keep "cheap and available." Because he wasn't good enough. I was all for trying Wentz because at least Wentz was at one point a good QB. I would literally have tried any QB with more talent rather than seeing Heinicke throw murder balls all over the field.
  8. Scott Turner never got a fair shake, I agree with that, however, he also couldn't come up with anything other than "run, run, pray." I used to drive literally the entire ES board nuts on gamedays because I would predict the first down run. I get it, your QB is not good. So try and do SOMETHING different. Change anything. Throw on first, run on second. Run the QB. Just do ANYTHING. But he could not adjust at all. If you become predictable, then the first down run won't work (and it rarely did), then you're in known passing situations with a QB who can't throw the ball. For that reason and that reason alone, I wanted him fired.
  9. I am glad he doesn't have to sleep on his sister's couch. I'm glad he's made good money, and hope he continues to play as a backup in the NFL. Hopefully against us some day. Because he can't win football games.
  10. I can't believe we have to relitigate this again. But at least now we're in the right thread for it. :)
 
Little schadenfreude for everyone, a ghost of Commanders past haunting someone else:

 
  1. The reason I use [REDACTED] to speak of Heinicke is because whenever he is mentioned, exactly what happens, happened: emotional response. So it became habit.
  2. He was terrible in just about every possible definition of terrible. He made late decisions, threw interceptions, and didn't have the arm strength to reach the sidelines.
  3. He owes Terry half of his income, because without Terry making Herculean effort plays, Taylor doesn't complete any passes outside a 10 yard box from where the ball is snapped.
  4. I don't blame Heinicke. He "fought his guts out." But he should never have been in a position to ever play. He had his one magical game against Tampa in the playoffs. That should have been it.
  5. When he went down to Atlanta, he couldn't beat out Riddler, then when Riddler sucked so much, they put Heinicke in, he sucked so much more they had to go back to Riddler.
  6. He's just a terrible QB. Good dude. Lots of heart. Just a terrible QB
  7. More annoying that anything were the group of fans who just wouldn't stop about him being worth giving a shot to. He wasn't worth giving a shot to. And they droned on and on about how he was cheap and why not just keep "cheap and available." Because he wasn't good enough. I was all for trying Wentz because at least Wentz was at one point a good QB. I would literally have tried any QB with more talent rather than seeing Heinicke throw murder balls all over the field.
  8. Scott Turner never got a fair shake, I agree with that, however, he also couldn't come up with anything other than "run, run, pray." I used to drive literally the entire ES board nuts on gamedays because I would predict the first down run. I get it, your QB is not good. So try and do SOMETHING different. Change anything. Throw on first, run on second. Run the QB. Just do ANYTHING. But he could not adjust at all. If you become predictable, then the first down run won't work (and it rarely did), then you're in known passing situations with a QB who can't throw the ball. For that reason and that reason alone, I wanted him fired.
  9. I am glad he doesn't have to sleep on his sister's couch. I'm glad he's made good money, and hope he continues to play as a backup in the NFL. Hopefully against us some day. Because he can't win football games.
  10. I can't believe we have to relitigate this again. But at least now we're in the right thread for it. :)

1. I agree about the emotional response. I myself admitted to being irritated, and I see how much of a response my post triggered, but I also notice the haters were at least as bad if not worse, e.g. I saw terms like “terrible,” “awful,” embarrassing,” “fanbois,” “shit stain,” and “shit ass” being used, not exactly the language of the even tempered. Really though it’s all in good fun, arguing about Washington’s quarterback is very much part of the tradition here.

1754952718892.jpeg


2. Perhaps, but the fact remains he was relatively successful in the stat that matters most, wins and losses. As I said, these are the only quarterbacks since Mark Rypien to post winning record for Washington: Brad Johnson, Tony Banks, Alex Smith, Taylor Heinicke, and Jayden Daniels. That’s it. Heinicke’s 12-11-1 record is even more impressive when you consider Haskins before him was 3-10 and Howell after him was 5-13.

And for the record, this is his statline for his three years (26 games) in Washington: 494 completions on 772 attempts (64%), 5415 yards, 33 touchdowns, 21 interceptions, 87.5 rating, plus 426 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns on 91 carries. Those may not be great stats compared to the NFL’s better quarterbacks, but they are not “terrible by every possible definition,” and certainly much better than Dwayne Haskins (74.4 rating), Carson Wentz (80.2 rating), and Sam Howell (77.5 rating) were when here. Maybe that is part of the disconnect, I am comparing him to the only other options we had at the time, whereas his detractors were comparing him to hypothetical quarterbacks who played for other teams.

3. Fair enough, Terry made him look good many times. I remember Ryan Fitzpatrick saying he taught him to throw it up there and give his guys a chance sometimes. I actually have one of these:

1754957038517.jpeg


4. He had more than that one magical wild card game. He had some winning streaks, game winning drives, divisions wins, etc. The most noteworthy is probably that legendary 19-play drive to beat Tampa Bay, a record that is likely to stand for a long time.



5. Fair enough, he has not had much success since he left here. I don’t think anybody regrets moving on from him, I certainly don’t, I just think the vitriolic hatred I see towards him is unwarranted. As you said, he is a good dude with lots of heart, and a lot of us enjoyed cheering for him at a time we didn’t have much to cheer.

7. I don’t know which fans said that, but obviously Taylor got more than a shot here, he got the opportunity of a lifetime and took advantage of it. It’s a great story from couch surfer to millionaire NFL QB.

I do recall fans being irritated when Taylor was benched in 2022, but honestly that was warranted. He was 5-3-1, our other quarterbacks were 3-6.

9. Maybe he can’t win football games anymore, he certainly hasn’t looked good in his few recent opportunities, but he did win twelve of them for us.

10. Yeah it’s definitely history. It looks like we finally have a franchise quarterback and the days of having to be happy with guys like Brad Johnson, Mark Brunell, Alex Smith, and Taylor Heinicke are behind us. Long live Jayden Daniels!
 
Last edited:
Allow me to retort.gif


1. First, I think most fans started off with "give the guy a chance." But I think most knowledgeable fans realized VERY QUICKLY after he came in for an injured Fitzpatrick he just couldn't play in the NFL. And I think what pushed most of us from "eh, he's not very good" to "get him the hell out of here" was the reaction of the Heinicke Hive, which was so ridiculously over the top, it made sane people insane. So, I'll grant you, the other side became more irrational in the other direction. That said, we have been proven right: he was traded, sucked in Atlanta, traded again, and might be done in the NFL.

2. I'd argue Heinicke had exactly 2 good games he started, ironically, both against Tampa. The playoff game they lost, and the game they won where he was very good at completing passes on third down. That's basically the list. The team won in spite of his atrocious play most of the time, with Terry bailing his dumb ass out over and over and over again. One thing about him, and even Bram Weinstein talked about this: he was the luckiest damn player in the league for a while. Balls which should be intercepted were caught or dropped by the defender. Bram kept talking about his "rabbits foot" and when it ran out, and it did run out, he got benched for Wentz, who was terrible.

3. The problem with "F&*(^ it Terry down there somewhere" is it's absolutely the WORST way to play QB. While he was on his lucky streak, it worked. But when it ran out, he returned to deplorable.

4. He had 2 good games. And I mentioned the other Tampa game, he played well. Do you know what his ratings were for the 4 games leading up to that game? 46, 70,86, 69. All losses. Remember the ridiculous fumble at the end of the Green Bay game? There were as many "Oh my God what the hell did he do" moments in the bad way as there were in the good way.

5. He was lucky when he was here. Turner had to run the ball a million times a game and pray they could convert 3rd downs. There was a poster on ES who loved to say "he beat Brady and Wilson and yadda yadda yadda." He didn't. The team did. Mostly in spite of him. Occasionally he was neutral, and rarely he helped them win. And that translated exactly the same way when he left here and didn't take his rabbit's foot with him.

9. He won MAYBE 2 for us. He was standing there and not able to screw it up for the other 10. The Giants game (which we would have lost if not for a missed Giants FG) he played well, I believe his only 300+ yard game, and the Tampa game. That's about it for games he actively contributed to a win. If he had to make some game winning drive or another, it's because he goobed it up earlier to put the team in position where he needed to make a play.

10. Brad Johnson won a SB with Tampa, and was a pro bowl QB with us. Dan screwed that up. Brunell was at one point a great QB, but we got him old. Alex Smith on one leg was better than Heinicke.

Long live JD.
 
🫣🫣🫣
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top