- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 55,807
- Reaction score
- 17,399
- Points
- 2,743
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch

- Alma Mater

I put a lot of this on the Ownership group. They opted to stick with a name a majority of fans at best tolerate and at worst detest. Had they committed to finding one that resonated better with the fanbase and at least didn’t have Snyder/Wright/Rivera stench all over it, there would be no major populist sentiment and hence no political impetus to try and return to ‘Redskins’.
Count me as one who isn’t thrilled about the idea of re-embracing controversy (despite feeling the name change thing was an overreaction from the start).
But this whole issue could’ve finally been put to bed with a new name that shed all-things Dan Snyder imho.
Count me as one who isn’t thrilled about the idea of re-embracing controversy (despite feeling the name change thing was an overreaction from the start).
But this whole issue could’ve finally been put to bed with a new name that shed all-things Dan Snyder imho.


