- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 55,812
- Reaction score
- 17,401
- Points
- 2,743
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch

- Alma Mater

I only partially agree. If they have to treat him as a WR - and put a corner on him - that's going to open things up for the WRs on the field, whether they have to worry about him as a blocker or not. We are talking about Sims as if he's some shrinking violet. As I recall, he's pretty physical after the catch so I am not certain he cannot be an adequate blocker. He was supposedly a strong blocker at Alabama and played ST for us his first year. I agree it's a huge plus if a TE can block - but for different reasons than you. I don't want teams being able to guess if it's a passing down or not based on which TEs are on the field. As far as the OC finding ways to get mismatches regardless of position - Sims currently is at best a project at WR and won't get much playing time. Move him to WR and (if it turns I'm right and he can play effectively there), he's suddenly a major contributor.
Chances are, this will never happen. I just wish we'd think a little more out of the box, because you can see that Sims has some real talent and it's a shame to not find a way to use him.
Chances are, this will never happen. I just wish we'd think a little more out of the box, because you can see that Sims has some real talent and it's a shame to not find a way to use him.




...I still call Brian Mitchell "Bitchell" over similar things. Plus the contrast is so sudden and striking in Dunbar's case that it makes the final "Thanks for being great statement" lose a BUNCH of its credibility.