Elephant
The Commissioner
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 24,950
- Reaction score
- 533
- Points
- 1,193
- Alma Mater

I actually think there's much less 'acting' and overly dramatic tumbling than in World Cups previous. Most of the yellow cards I saw involved players getting beaten and getting taken down from behind. I don't know whether that warrants an automatic yellow card or not, but it seems to me there can be a lot of difference between a little minor over-aggression from behind and brutally knocking someone down who beats you enroute to a scoring opportunity. What I'm seeing is, they're yellow-carding it all regardless of the context of the moment.
Maybe I need more education on what constitutes a 'yellow card' scenario.
When I was a referee, the rule stated you are to card a man for a take down from behind, any take down from behind. If there did not appear to be malice, but the take down did occur from behind, a yellow card was warranted. If it was blatant or even a mild take down from behind denying the opportunity for a one on one, the red card is warranted.
Of course, throughout my years as a ref, I rarely gave reds in this scenario, but I gave a lot of yellows. The one thing I always had to keep in mind was that I was liable as the referee. I hated that part of the job, but I always made sure I was covered. Take down from behind and a yellow should be given at the least.
The one thing I hated about my beloved sport was the acting/feigning injury when barely touched. I was so happy when they made the rule that a yellow card is standard for obvious acting. I loved giving cards out for that!




