2 of the 3 Super Bowl wins came in strike shortened seasons. That matters - if only a little. Sure, you can argue that this only speaks to Gibbs ability to keep a team together and win regardless of cast, but I think from a pure football point of view, it does slightly tarnish the accomplishment. Had Gibbs been able to get there again in Gibbs II, he'd be talked about right up there with Lombardi, Knoll, and others... The other factor is that for as much success as he had, Gibbs was always low key, never made his success about himself, never did anything 'controversial', and diverted credit to others. He was the Art Monk of coaches. I hate that this kind of stuff matters, but it does.