

I've always said he takes fewer sacks because he gets the ball out faster. but its his accuracy when he does that which is his biggest issue.
Griffin - 23 INTs
Cousins - 27INTs
Griffin - 40TDs
Cousins - 224TDs
Holy balls that's a lot of TDs. Did I fall asleep when this dreaminess was happening?![]()

So saw a new post from the Sports Bog. In it, Sheehan claims we should throw out Griffin's 2012 season since that version is never coming back. Fair enough. So I decided to pull up Griffin's numbers from 2013-2014 and compare them to Cousins' numbers for his career. Let's take a look:
Griffin:
5-15 record as a starter
421/670, 62.8, 4897, 20:18, 7.3ypa, 71 sacks
Cousins:
4-11 record as a starter
391/635, 61.6, 4450, 24:27, 7.0ypa, 23 sacks
Ok, so Cousins takes fewer sacks. Outside of that, what does he do differently than Griffin?
.....in additionGive us a better chance to win the game?
.....in addition
Lost yards to sacks can cost field position, craps on down and distance to move the chains, gets the QB injured more frequently, inspires the opposing D.
Give us a better chance to win the game?
More namecalling huh? Okay - to each his own.


Give us a better chance to win the game?


It may be one of those things that 'seems to be so' but the stats don't bear it out - but our 3rd down conversion rate and the ability to keep drives going (as well as TOP) *seems* greatly improved with Cousins under center. Don't know if the numbers reflect it or not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
agree too, but having almost 3 times the sacks might play into that equation just as easily.while I agree, interceptions cause drives to stop even faster and cause the defense to be back on the field more often to try and stop scores. its really a case of who you prefer...both of them are horrible but whatever camp you're in is the one you back.