it should be obvious by now that it becomes progressively harder to read offenses when your arse is getting pounded every play. the sham argument abt the other QBs not being subject to the same poor o-line play/sacks (which was always weak to the degree that it neglected picks) was put to rest this past weekend.
the observation that the shift to a new system under live play is accurate: Griffin played very little in the preseason and only 4 games this season under less than stellar conditions. watching film. slow mo practice is nothing compared to live play - why just look at our sorry arse secondary. come to thiok of it...why not? don't hear folks really zooming in on this play in the same way (i.e., sack em...they have had time and are not studying). in fact, I'm onboard with you if the principle is applied across the board. from where I sit, about half the team can be whittled down/shipped off based on the same criteria applied to Griffin. somehow, magically, these other players who can't execute their jobs are salvageable. Murphy can't passrush if his llife depended on it- a much simpler task than QB'ing - but somehow he can learn!
in the end....I get the dynamic of giving up early on a player out of context - it's a DC fandom legacy afterall. what seems problematic is the superficial analysis on how to fix things, viable alternatives (vice patches)...and context on the ways multiple factors inter-act to produce the slovenly football we have been subjected to for two straight years....regardless of who is QB'ing. Put griffin behind a decent line, provide some good coaching and a stable system and my bet is he blossoms. I'm hoping that is what eventually happens when he is picked up by Philly or dallass.
I never once made mention that the other QBs are not subject to the same poor O-line play/sacks. In fact the entire time we've all been having this conversation I have been very critical of the play of the O-line. The play action on 1st down after the INT was the perfect example. McCoy drops back and immediately looks to the left side where Jackson was matched up 1 on 1. Jackson got behind the defender and before McCoy could pull the trigger the pocket was gone. The read was correct. THAT is on the O-Line. No question. In the game vs TB when we were attempting to drive down the field. Griffin drops back and play actions to Morris. Jackson on his right side is man to man and breaks open. Griffin doesn't even look that way. He then scrambles to his right trying to avoid the rush and misses Niles Paul in the flat throwing it at his feet.
If you want to make the argument about the time on the field in live fire situations... McCoy has played 2.5 games in this system and has been making the correct reads. While it might have been in garbage time, he's also posted 350+, 3 TDs, 0 INTs (SHOULD have been 1, he got lucky).
This is not an endorsement for McCoy to be the future. It's simply drawing a comparison about a qb who CAN make the reads, and a qb who CAN'T make the reads, both behind the same O-Line. We ABSOLUTELY need help at O-line I've never disputed that. I also face palmed at least 2 times in pivotal moments when Alf was lined up 1 on 1 in pass protection. Whoever is responsible for that, whether it be a missed assignment on O-Line, a horrible schemed play, or a misread of pass pro from the center, it shouldnt have happened. NO DOUBT. I've never said Griffin was THE problem, just that his inability to execute the things needed for an NFL QB on a fundamental level is a major problem... among others.


