
Yep, Phelps is now the greatest Olympian of all time.
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
Such a subjective term don't you think? Most decorated of all time and one of the best, but it's too hard to determine the "greatest".
Oh and where is all the criticism of him now? A few days ago he was a pariah...today?

I personally don't think its subjective at all. The measure of an Olympic athlete literally is the number of medals they win. An argument could be made about where swimming ranks in terms of difficulty, but IMO swimming is one of the more demanding & competitive sports in the world. Phelps has dominated the sport. 22 Olympic races he has entered, and he's finished in the top 3 in all but 3 of them. He could finish with an astounding 88% medal rate when its all said and done, if he medals in his last 3 races of these games (I've only been able to find 2 more for him - 200m individual medley and 100m butterfly, so maybe he's only got two more races?).
And its not like he was eeking out victories - in 2008 he set new world records in 7 of 8 events. That's incredible! He broke Mark Spitz's 36 year-old record of 7 gold medals in one games. With his 19th medal yesterday, he broke Larisa Latynina's 48 year old record (the only other athlete in the conversation, IMO - her 14 individual medals are better than Phelps' 11, but his 15 gold medals are the most of any athlete ever).
Serv's skeet shooter could be entered into the argument, but skeet shooting is a sport that lends itself to longevity - swimming is not. There's no chance a swimmer could medal in 5 straight games - they'd be in their 40's by the 5th games.
I'm not sure if this was directed at me, but my position has been pretty consistent.
He has not prepared for these games like he did in 2008 - that much is clear. However, its amazing to me that he can mail it in and still keep medaling in these events, that's how natural of a swimmer he is.
19 medals is something we may never see again!
See, you are measuring the term "greatest" by the amount of medals one wins, and it is not a factor that should eliminate any Olympian as a great. He is definitely the winningest Olympian and his name should be considered as the greatest, but winning medals is not the only measure of greatness in the Olympics.
Not directed toward you. It's clear in this thread you and I both agree he was being judged harshly. I think the last few days has been harder on Lochte than Phelps.

I agree with that - we are using different measures to describe greatness. In that manner its very subjective. I'm sure we can both agree that Phelps is one of the greatest of all time!
Any American who wins gold is taxed nearly 9k. Unreal
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
They've put in tens of thousands of dollars, tens of thousands of hours just to represent this country. They should ve exempt for that. It is a big deal.
Posted via BGO Mobile Device

Interesting - my buddy on the Hill tells me that Congress is going to introduce a bill in the next few days to make Olympic athletes' medals and prize money exempt from income tax.