Random Cool Photo

Here's one that been in the works for quite some time. A huge piece, 35" wide at 300DPI. A folding map that had been produced on canvas in 1794. I fell in love with the photo of the map a few years back. There's a standard type face used sparingly, and hand calligraphy by two artisans. The left lower detail tells a story about the Kingdom of Naples, and it's past victory over an invading empire attempting to take over Italy.
naples small copy.jpg
 
I can't compete with El & Miles but here's a couple I snapped today.

image.jpg
image.jpg
 
It’s a trite saying, but 'Try, try until you succeed’ does hold true even today. Case-in-point is Scottish photographer Alan McFadyen, who spent six long years trying to get the perfect shot of a kingfisher diving into water. 720,000 tries later, he finally succeeded!

600x892xperfect-photo-600x892.jpg
 
I frequently play around with photography and have decided to take it a bit more seriously. (Many thanks to Elephant for some recent suggestions which resulted in a new camera that's being delivered tomorrow.)

Here is one that I snapped a few weeks ago as a storm rolled into my new home beach. I took it with my phone camera, can't wait to have a real camera to play with.

BoyntonBeachsmall.jpg
 
I frequently play around with photography and have decided to take it a bit more seriously. (Many thanks to Elephant for some recent suggestions which resulted in a new camera that's being delivered tomorrow.)

Here is one that I snapped a few weeks ago as a storm rolled into my new home beach. I took it with my phone camera, can't wait to have a real camera to play with.

View attachment 2819

What ya getting ?
 
It seems that everyone down here is getting on of those, or something similar. They are also having to get a zoom lens so they have more to carry than normal. have a Nikon P900 that allows me to zoom in to a subject over 150 feet away, without the mega zoom lens.

DSCN0053 (Medium).jpg

Photo was taken from about 80 feet away, very little zoom.
 
It seems that everyone down here is getting on of those, or something similar. They are also having to get a zoom lens so they have more to carry than normal. have a Nikon P900 that allows me to zoom in to a subject over 150 feet away, without the mega zoom lens.

View attachment 2822

Photo was taken from about 80 feet away, very little zoom.

That's pretty impressive cobber. I think the difference with the zoom / tele lenses you see people lugging around is the ability to use very fast shutter speeds while using natural light, and getting amazing stop action and clarity. Of course, I can't afford that type of gear, but would be happy to lug it around. I have an average 70 /300 tele zoom, and if I didn't shoot manually, most action shots I take would be junk. I have to depend on my set up, and can't justify dropping a few thousand dollars for a lens when I don't have the time at this point in my life to go out and shoot often. Saddly, even if I sold my 05 Triumph, it would only get me close to the price of the lens I lust after.
 
That's pretty impressive cobber. I think the difference with the zoom / tele lenses you see people lugging around is the ability to use very fast shutter speeds while using natural light, and getting amazing stop action and clarity. Of course, I can't afford that type of gear, but would be happy to lug it around. I have an average 70 /300 tele zoom, and if I didn't shoot manually, most action shots I take would be junk. I have to depend on my set up, and can't justify dropping a few thousand dollars for a lens when I don't have the time at this point in my life to go out and shoot often. Saddly, even if I sold my 05 Triumph, it would only get me close to the price of the lens I lust after.

600mm? Ha! 10k for that sucker!

I had the 70-300 and was able to get fantastic shots, but only in the daylight...just doesn't perform well in low light. I wish I'd never sold it.
 
Last edited:
600mm? Ha! 10k for that sucker!

I had the 70-300 and was able to get fantastic shots, but only in the day. Just doesn't perform well in low light. I wish I'd never sold it.

LOL... 600, I be happy with a nice 400. Hell, my 70 / 300 is almost useless with a polarizing filter at dusk. I do like the lens, and it's served me well. I vividly remember the first time I shot with it. I had been on the staff of ES for a bit over a year, and was given the gift of a lifetime... I got to cover a home game. The past year, I had covered the Tampa game using a borrowed camera from Art. Don't know why, but he never posted any pics. When I saw the schedule, and confirmed I didn't misread it for the 25th time, I knew it was the exact moment I had to make the switch from film to digital. Didn't really have any bread, so I sold my second motorcycle, and on the recommendation of Boone, picked up my first Canon, a standard lens, and the 70 / 300. Got the rig about two and a half weeks before the game. Dam thing had so many buttons and such, I thought I was screwed, and would let everybody down, so I went out and quickly realized I could use it exactly the same as my 35mm. Shot my daughters soccer games, and two football games, and it was off to DC. I don't even remember where I was the night before wit a bunch of the ES members, and took a call from another staffer. When he heard I didn't get the lens with stabilization, I got a 10 minute lecture on how my shots were going to come out like shit. Just what I needed the night before my shoot of a lifetime. It's old hat for you, but it was the first home game I ever attended no less. It was truly an amazing day. I only pissed one pro shooter on the sidelines when I didn't realize he was leaning over me as I knelt. We had a big play, and I jumped up, tagging his lens with my head, slamming his camera into his face. They weren't the most friendly group, excepting one guy who was very cool the entire day, not treating me as an outsider. Showing him some of my shots, he told me I had to be the luckiest som bitch there, nailing three TD's while standing at the goal line.

JC had a career day, lighting up Detroit in a big way. It was a dream come true, and the pics were as good as you could get with a medium format body, and an average lens. Even catching those three scores, the money shot was the shot of Sean as he took of with the ball after intercepting. Needless to say, the other staffer never said another word. That Monday I was thrilled when I got contacted about use of the photo by a news agency for an online story.

That old lens and I have been through a lot over the years, but the first shoot will always be the most special.
 
I did some research and found that the D7100 is being sold, body only, for between $700 and $850. With a lens, it is going for between $1100 and $1300. However, it usually gets sold down here as a twin lens kit (standard lens and zoom lens) for about $1000. Go figure. To think that the D7100 is NOT the latest of the D series cameras. The most recent here is the D7200, which goes for, with a standard lens, for between $1250 and $1500.

As I said, I'm still learning the ins and outs of my P900, but already I have been offered the job as official photographer for a local football (AFL) league. The league has already used some of my photos in the program, and I have had the front page on three out of six editions. I have also been offered the same position by a local cricket team.

If interested, here's the official website for the P900.

http://www.nikon.com.au/en_AU/product/digital-compact-cameras/performance/coolpix-p900
 
That's pretty impressive cobber. I think the difference with the zoom / tele lenses you see people lugging around is the ability to use very fast shutter speeds while using natural light, and getting amazing stop action and clarity.

I often see photographers lugging around two, sometimes three, rigged cameras for that 'just in case' moment. Withmy photos, I just sit in the one spot, adjust my camera to suit and be done with it. None of this 'What should I use for ths shot' or 'Should I use A or B?'. The only add-on I regularly use is a monopod, and I sometimes use a tripod, but with the anti-shake lens, it's not often I use the monopod now.
 
I carried two rigs for many years, but only so I didn't have to do any lens changes while in the field. Those old film rigs were fairly heavy for sure, so I'm happy to not be doing that any more. These days, with the quick release set up I have, I can carry the camera very comfortably on one hip and another lens on the other side. I don't find myself in one spot for long most often, so I need the ease without wearing myself out. While I have a monopod, I hardly ever use it even without image stabilizing. Thankfully, I'm still very steady.
 
My D3 with the 70-200mm f/2.8 weighs almost 9 pounds. I wear that with another camera, usually my D700 (since my D810 is my money maker) with a 16-35mm on a shoulder harness. Then there are the pros on the sidelines who lug around their 300 or 400mm lenses, along with the cameras I carry.

And Pete, I know exactly who those pros on the sideline are...one of the guys that work for the Post is about as rude an asshat as you'll find. My buddy who is one of the Ravens official photographers is kinda the same way...his motto is, you want to be on the sideline photographing the game, earn it like everyone out there has. Meh...I have been told my work is as good as his. I know it's really not, but nice to hear nonetheless.

Anyway, this is the Random Cool Photo thread, so here goes one of my favorite night time exposures.

BLT_4108 copy.jpg
 
I'm another who has been on the receiving end of an asshat photog. As he had been at a particular venue longer than I had, he thought he could lord it over me. I accepted that he had priority but he really went overboard when he was asked to put his camera gear away at the venue I was working. The management instigated it as I was happy to work with him, and after that, he changed his tune about other photographers 'encroaching' on his turf.

Anyways, I have a gathering to go to tonight so will take my camera, and I have another 'shoot' tomorrow. I'll post the best when ready.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top