The 2026 Free Agency Thread

knowing how much SF seems to be operating out of pettiness, this is a really bad tactical move. Maybe it embarrasses the 49ers. More likely it just pisses them off more.
 
Aiyuk's strategy appears to be, listen intently to my highly paid agent's advice - then do the exact opposite. Antagonizing an organization whose cooperation you need to find a new home, when they have all of the leverage and power, well - it's just plain stupid. I'm not sure we need to be adding stupid players.
 
Aiyuk's strategy appears to be, listen intently to my highly paid agent's advice - then do the exact opposite. Antagonizing an organization whose cooperation you need to find a new home, when they have all of the leverage and power, well - it's just plain stupid. I'm not sure we need to be adding stupid players.
It sure isn't a great look. Why is it almost always the WR's that are the freaking odd prima donna's?
 
knowing how much SF seems to be operating out of pettiness, this is a really bad tactical move. Maybe it embarrasses the 49ers. More likely it just pisses them off more.

That's my fear. Kyle by reputation is high strung and vindictive, so engaging in a pissing contest I think will encourage Kyle to double down, not relent.
 
Yep. And Lynch seems to be cut from the same cloth.
 
Yep. And Lynch seems to be cut from the same cloth.

Yeah he better show up to camp because I go little doubt they'd IR him if he doesn't because they'd have the power to shelve him for the season without pay.
 
Yeah he better show up to camp because I go little doubt they'd IR him if he doesn't because they'd have the power to shelve him for the season without pay.
If he is on IR wouldn't the Niners be on the hook for his 2026 salary? How can they shelve him and get out of paying him?
 
I won't really care about this stuff if Brandon Aiyuk starts catching touchdown passes. I suspect most of you won't as well. But I'd sure feel better if we went into camp with Diggs, hard to say what he is demanding, and then they can work in Aiyuk. Suddenly our receiving room will look a whole lot different.
 
My point is, the team may well decide his behavior and lack of judgment raises enough concerns to steer clear from him. It would be entirely understandable if that's what happens, WR needs aside.
 
If he is on IR wouldn't the Niners be on the hook for his 2026 salary? How can they shelve him and get out of paying him?

Maybe the term is not IR, I don't recall, but I've read and posted here weeks back from SF reporters, that if Aiyuk doesn't show to camp, they can shelve him for the season without pay with one SF reporter speculating that 50-50 that actually happens.
 
Maybe the term is not IR, I don't recall, but I've read and posted here weeks back from SF reporters, that if Aiyuk doesn't show to camp, they can shelve him for the season without pay with one SF reporter speculating that 50-50 that actually happens.
Same thing that the Bucs did with Keyshawn Johnson? The deactivated him but I believe they still had to pay him. I'm not sure how the Niners can do this but if they can I can certainly see them doing it. I hope AP is in the loop, hard to say. But all signs seem to point to Aiyuk to Washington eventually.
 
Same thing that the Bucs did with Keyshawn Johnson? The deactivated him but I believe they still had to pay him. I'm not sure how the Niners can do this but if they can I can certainly see them doing it. I hope AP is in the loop, hard to say. But all signs seem to point to Aiyuk to Washington eventually.

Yeah. This isn't a new subject, this was posted on months ago, and has been discussed. But yeah apparently if he doesn't show up to camp whether its by rule or mechanisms in his contract, he doesn't get paid and gets shelved for the season if SF chooses to act on it, according to SF reporters.
 
Maybe the term is not IR, I don't recall, but I've read and posted here weeks back from SF reporters, that if Aiyuk doesn't show to camp, they can shelve him for the season without pay with one SF reporter speculating that 50-50 that actually happens.

I think they have a DNR ("Did Not Report") list.
 
They rank 12th in cash spending. Dallas is No. 1. Philadelphia is No. 5. The Giants are No. 10.

And before anyone jumps down my throat, let me repeat what I've said many times: I like Harris. I like Peters. I was pushing for both of them long before they got here. But this doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing conversation where you either love every decision they make or you're somehow against the regime.

There should be room for nuance. Pointing out areas where you'd like to see more aggression doesn't mean you're rooting against the team, hoping to be proven right, or looking for reasons to complain. It means you're invested. lol, I want a SB and soon. And I think they can do it.

As for wanting to be right, I couldn't care less. I just want to win. I think that's true for all of us. And if we're being honest, everyone who follows this stuff has opinions that end up looking brilliant one year and foolish the next. That's the nature of the NFL. If any of us were batting 1.000 on personnel decisions, we'd be working for a front office instead of debating it on message boards.

At the core, my position is simple: maximize Jayden's rookie contract window. They were aggressive this offseason. I'd give them a B, maybe a B+. But I wouldn't call it all-in.

Part of the reason they consistently rank high in free-agent spending is because they're operating on so many one-year deals. When you churn a significant portion of the roster every offseason, you have to spend money just to replace departing players and fill out the depth chart. New faces come in, veterans leave, and the cycle repeats. We'll probably see the same thing next year.

As for the point from a 76ers fan about Harris saying he'll spend more when the team is ready, I'm not sure if that's a direct quote. What I do know is that his 76ers are currently seventh in payroll. So it's not as if he's afraid to invest.

That brings me back to what I've said before. I believe Harris is willing to spend. I expect Washington to be a big spender under his ownership. But there's a difference between being a big spender and being one of the most aggressive organizations in football. Right now they're 12th.

When your franchise quarterback is costing roughly $10 million against the cap, that's the time to step on the gas. Because that advantage doesn't last forever. In a few short years, Jayden could be carrying a $60-65 million cap number. Once that happens, every roster decision becomes harder.
Well said as usual SIP, and thanks for the reply. My question is when you say “cash spending“ what exactly do you mean by that? Because I am only referring to expenditures on players, everything else to me is an investment in the organization and not subject to any kind of minimum or maximum. My understanding is that we are somewhere in the neighborhood of 40–50 mil under the cap. Are you telling me that 2/3 of the league is spending less than that?
 
First of all, there's no way he's going to 'jail' for posting a video speeding. He'll pay a fine and go on his way. We finally have a roster that is relatively knucklehead free, so I'm not sure I am that excited about bringing one in. He seems to love the drama. I will say this. He's got some of the biggest hands I've ever seen on a WR, lol...

I wonder if he could still face a suspension from the league for the player conduct policy.
 
Well said as usual SIP, and thanks for the reply. My question is when you say “cash spending“ what exactly do you mean by that? Because I am only referring to expenditures on players, everything else to me is an investment in the organization and not subject to any kind of minimum or maximum. My understanding is that we are somewhere in the neighborhood of 40–50 mil under the cap. Are you telling me that 2/3 of the league is spending less than that?

Cash spending is generally the best measure of what a team is actually paying players in a given year. It's a better gauge of ownership's willingness to spend right now and whether they're truly pushing chips into the middle of the table.

For example, signing bonuses count as cash spending immediately because the player receives the money upfront. That's one reason teams like the Eagles under Jeffrey Lurie have been so aggressive. The player gets paid right away, while the team benefits from favorable cap treatment because the bonus is spread out over the life of the contract.

Let's say a player receives a $20 million signing bonus on a four-year deal. The player gets the $20 million now, but the cap hit is only $5 million per year for the next four seasons. It's a win for both sides: the player gets immediate cash, and the team gains cap flexibility.

So your point that free-agent spending isn't the best measure of overall spending is absolutely correct. In fact, it's especially misleading when discussing this team because of its preference for one-year contracts and constant roster turnover.

Take a simple example. Zach Ertz leaves and frees up salary. Chig Okonkwo arrives and gets paid. Free-agent spending only counts the Chig signing; it doesn't account for the money that came off the books when Ertz departed. It's like spending $20 on lasagna yesterday and $20 on pizza today. If you only count today's pizza purchase, you'd conclude I spent $20 more on food, when in reality my spending stayed exactly the same.

To their credit, the Commanders have increased their cash spending, moving from 18th to 12th in the league. That's a sign ownership is investing more in the roster. But it's also fair to say this hasn't looked like an all-in effort to maximize every year of Jayden Daniels' rookie contract. They've spent more, but not at the level of a team pushing every available resource toward a championship window.



AI Overview



Cash spending is widely considered the truest gauge of an owner's financial commitment to winning. While the salary cap acts as an artificial, league-mandated accounting budget, cash spending represents the actual dollar amount leaving an owner's bank account to pay player salaries and massive signing bonuses.

 
As far as Aiyuk, I am still good with it in spite of the craziness.

lol, as I've made clear, I’m personally not in the camp that trusts Peters implicitly. There are moves he's made that I've liked quite a bit, and there are others I haven't agreed with. Overall, though, my view of his tenure is positive. I think he's a smart GM, he's built a healthier organization, and on balance he's done a good job.

That said, I do think he's been too conservative (or maybe its Harris, I don't know?) when it comes to maximizing Jayden Daniels' rookie-contract window. Because of that, I'm generally not going to criticize Peters for taking an aggressive swing. Even a wild-risky one like this.

My view of Peters isn't based on some blanket, homer-style defense of everything the organization does. It's much simpler than that. I evaluate each move on its own merits and whether it aligns with what I think gives this team the best chance to compete for a championship.

When he makes a move I like, I'll say so. When he makes one I don't, I'll say that too.

I wish Peters had done more at wide receiver in free agency—not just this year, but in 2024 and 2025 as well. At some point, enough is enough. This has been a glaring need for multiple offseasons, and we're still having the same conversation.

At this stage, there aren't many meaningful options left. If it were up to me, I'd sign Diggs. But reading the tea leaves and listening to the insiders, it feels like Aiyuk is the more likely target if they make a move.

Either way, I'd be on board with it.

I've been arguing on and off for two years that this team needs to invest more heavily in the position. So if Peters finally decides to push some chips into the middle of the table and make a significant move, I'm not going to complain about the risk. I'd welcome it.

At some point, you have to stop treating wide receiver like a position you can patch together with flyers, depth pieces, and best-case projections. When you have a young franchise quarterback on a rookie contract, that's exactly the time to be aggressive about surrounding him with proven weapons. Granted Aiyuk does feel like he's in that "flyer" category but at least he's one with upside.
 
I'm sure it's a total coincidence SF is the only team that canceled their mandatory June minicamp. 'Cause surely Lynch and Shanahan ain't THAT petty, right?

It was supposedly a reward for 100% attendance at the voluntary OTAs last week. But it wasn't really 100%, was it, because Aiyuk wasn't there and he's still on the roster.

I'm sure there's no way Aiyuk's agent (yes, he still has one) told SF that he finally cornered BA and the wackadoodle promised he'd show up for minicamp next week - which would have forced their hand. This way, SF gets to keep stringing Aiyuk along on their little revenge tour.

Feels like this should make it a no-brainer for Peters to tell JD5, look, we can't wait any longer, we'll try to do something if SF ever releases your BFF - and go sign Diggs for crying out loud. I'm tired of hearing Quinn's coach-speak about how everything is rainbows and lollipops in the WR room.
I honest to God don't thin they're waiting for Aiyuk.

I do think, rightly or wrongly, they think they are fine at WR with who they have, at least for now until they get into TC. Reports out of camp are the guys are doing well. Maybe that's because the secondary is trash, but maybe it's because the guys here are developing. It's almost impossible to say.

I also think they believe that they have enough weapons on offense and the Outside WR2 will not be the second target of the offense. The reason they think this is that they are REALLY going to try and limit the passing attempt by running the ball 50% of the time. If that's the case, there are only ~30-35 passing snaps in the game. Target 1 is Terry. Target 2 is Chig. Target 3 is probably Williams in the slot. Target 4 is probably White out of the backfield, or somebody in that role. Target 5 is Outside WR2.

If you sortof do the math, that means outside WR2 is only primary on maybe 5 plays a game. And if you spread the ball around between Terry, Chig, Williams and RB, that is a lot of diversity by itself. The offense can essentially force teams not to bracket Terry if it can make it pay by targeting Chig/Williams/White. You don't NEED the player to pull coverage to be the other outside guy. It can come from a variety of places. And running the ball well is another component of that.

Now, I'm not necessarily saying that's the ideal way or the way I would want to do it, but they tried to upgrade the WR2 spot, and they couldn't, so here we are.

One thing which did stand out: Quinn specifically called out Lane as a guy who has really improved from year 1 to year 2. If true, that's really promising overall. He mentioned him by name. If that's true, maybe there is a world where Lane could be in the slot and if Williams develops on the outside, he slides outside. That's a lot of speed on the field at the same time. But we need to see it before we can believe it.

Something on Diggs: He hasn't signed anywhere. We could have made an offer. We could have made a very good offer. We also might not have. He might just not want to sign right now. Him not signing anywhere is interesting. I would have thought Philly would have made a big play for him with the trade of Brown. I get that positionally, maybe not exactly what they need. But it would be a proven guy to add to the mix. The Giants just signed OBJ and JuJu Smith-Schuster. OBJ hasn't played in a year and JuJu had 33 receptions for 350 yards. Diggs would have made more sense for them too, and he didn't sign there. So something is up with Diggs. It might not be us, it might be him.
 
If Diggs' game at this stage of his career is becoming more slot-centric, then he doesn't strike me as an obvious fit for either the Eagles or the Giants. The Giants already added Mooney, and the Eagles just drafted Lemon. You never know, but neither destination screams perfect match to me.

As much as I like Antonio Williams' potential, I'd still take a proven veteran who can realistically give you 1,000 yards in this receiving corps. Even if there's some overlap stylistically with what they already have, proven production matters. This offense still needs another receiver defenses have to account for.

As far as Quinn touting Lane as the dude who is standing out as a breakout player, last year it was Quan Martin for him. I am glad but lol it doesn't move me until I see it in games.

Logan-Grant discussed Lane being good in camp last year but it not translating during the season.

Looking at the group of Burks, Dyami, Lane, McCaffrey, and Van Jefferson, if I had to bet on one player taking a meaningful step forward, it would probably be McCaffrey. Even then, I'm not sure he'll get enough opportunities if Antonio Williams establishes himself early. And while I can see one of those players emerging as a solid No. 3 option, I'd bet against any of them becoming a legitimate No. 2 receiver on a championship-level offense.

I also doubt Antonio Williams ends up being a full-time Z receiver. From what I've seen, he's more likely to play a heavy dose of slot while mixing in some snaps outside. Between Williams and Chig, there may not be many slot reps left for the backup receivers. That could leave Burks or Dyami with the best opportunity to carve out a meaningful role on the outside.

Of course, all of that could become irrelevant if they eventually land Aiyuk, which I still think is the most likely outcome.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 19, Members: 0, Guests: 19)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top