The 2026 Free Agency Thread

I'm pretty sure this has been asked, but why is the FO holding out for the release of a WR coming off a MAJOR knee injury who hasn't played a game in almost two calendar years?
I really don't think they are.

I think they see him as a low risk/high reward gamble if it ever materializes, and they'd be kindof fine if it didn't materialize. Jayden Daniels wants to play with his buddy, so bringing him in to give him a shot, given how good he was, isn't a bad idea.

But I think that's all it is. I don't think they're counting on him. I think some of the "they have interest" has been massively overblown by outside sources. Do they have interest? Maybe some. If I had to guess, I'd bet that Jayden's interest (and Aiyuk's interest) is higher than Peters' interest. But Peters also doesn't want to just say "no" and irritate his starting QB, and if it's low risk, then why the hell not bring him in for a shot?

If Peters is concerned about the WR room, he would have signed somebody by now. And they might shock the world and sign Diggs. But I don't think they are planning on Aiyuk coming in and "saving the day." Coming in and showing he can play would be the bar.
 
Always expect the unexpected. :) I agree that's what we're hearing, and it might be right. It's also the safe bet. It also could change if they don't like what they see in OTAs and mini-camps.


The only thing I'd point out is that I think there are other areas of the roster which I think are better than 2024, and if you're going to have a hole somewhere on offense and have to committee it, WR2 isn't the worst spot to have it.

I don't think its the worst spot to have it, but its top 4 especially considering this has been an issue for three years running and there is some evidence judging by likes to social media posts blasting the WR situation from Jayden's mom and BFF -- that there at least is a chance that when some of us whine about the lack of supporting cast for Jayden and especially compared to the other QBs drafted in the 2024 class, that Jayden isn't privately thinking yeah who cares let Caleb or Drake have the weapons, I don't give a rats behind if its harder for me than them.

As for the 2026 roster being better. lol, even though the national media, mock draft community to a lesser extent Vegas thinks this roster is trash mostly -- I think its about average myself and Jayden elevates it to above average. I think the defense and offensive line is better. But the rest of it nope.

I know am arguing with the wrong person on this unless you changed on this point -- in the past to you its just as likely that the Cardinals will be good as it as the Seakawks - the past has zero prologue to the future and Vegas and all those who think otherwise are suckers. Sheehan I noticed used to think this way too but he's backed off in recent years. But my point is the weakest schedule in the NFL to one of the hardest is not going to be apples to apples as to 2024 versus 2026. Give me that 2024 schedule and I'll be dreaming now of a postseason run.

- The OL is better if for the only reason Tunsil is a top 5, maybe better, LT in the league. While LG is going to be a competition, Paul played well enough last year to say it won't be a weakness in the "worst case" that he wins the competition, Allegretti is a perfectly servicable center, Cosmi is a top 10 RG, and Coleman had a really good rookie year.

O line is better.

Chig is a significant upgrade in athleticism and explosiveness from the TE position.

Coming from one of the lead people who pushed Chig in FA. We got zero clue its better. Chig has never had a season that matches what Ertz did in 2024. Chig isn't much of a TD guy. Not known as a killer route runner. His thing is speed and YAC. Ertz the opposite -- not speed or YAC but a route running technician and red zone target. Different. There is no evidence that Chig is better than 2024 Ertz. Zip. Listening to Greg Cosell on Keim's podcast -- he's one of my fav film guys, he is not high on this TE room. Not that I need to hear it from him. But for me its a TBD.

- The RB position is going to be RB by committee. But I think it's better than 2024. The guy who I think gets lost is Rachaad White, who's a very capable pass-catcher out of the backfield. His best season was 2023, where he was the featured back in Tampa, and he had 990 yards rushing and 550 yards receiving. Even last year, as a backup, he had 572 yards rushing and 218 yards passing. They also have Bill, the guy they drafted, and a few other guys. The moment they signed White I thought it was because they are going to use some 2 RB sets, and use him as a receiver out of the backfield.
Which

It's weird for me the RB debate. I was easily the dude who talked up Croskey-Merritt the most before that draft. I am up there as one of the ones who pushed Rashaasd White a ton in FA before the draft. But they are very overrated by some of our fans here IMO.

Rachaad White has been solid. Good pass catcher. Good pass protector. Pedestrian runner. Fumbiling problem until last season. 3.9 career YPC, and he is one of the least explosive backs in the league. He's not better than Ekeler. He lasted for sometime in FA and he got under 2 million for a season, not because he's a secret superstar -- but IMO is a really solid player.

I wasn't a Brian Robinson guy and they barely used Rodriguez that year. to me its close to a wash 2024 versus 2026. I like the depth though better for 2026, so I'll give 2026 a slight nod.

Which is why I would actually sign Diggs over Aiyuk. Whether they will or not is yet to be seen. I have no idea if Aiyuk could fill in if Terry gets hurt. He might be able to. But he hasn't played a game since a horrific knee injury in 2024, and he's been a head case ever since. I know Diggs could step into the role.

Not having a #2 presents two problems.

A. Teams can bracket and shut down the #1, ala what the Eagles sometimes do to Terry, without fear of getting burned on the other side

B. Any team suffers when they lose the #1, but most have the luxury of having a #2 that can threaten a defense enough to become the #1 in a pinch -- when you don't have that guy, you got the 2025 season.
 
Last edited:
Always expect the unexpected. :) I agree that's what we're hearing, and it might be right. It's also the safe bet. It also could change if they don't like what they see in OTAs and mini-camps.


The only thing I'd point out is that I think there are other areas of the roster which I think are better than 2024, and if you're going to have a hole somewhere on offense and have to committee it, WR2 isn't the worst spot to have it.

- The OL is better if for the only reason Tunsil is a top 5, maybe better, LT in the league. While LG is going to be a competition, Paul played well enough last year to say it won't be a weakness in the "worst case" that he wins the competition, Allegretti is a perfectly servicable center, Cosmi is a top 10 RG, and Coleman had a really good rookie year.
- They are going to get more explosive plays from TE. Ertz was great in the red zone and 3rd down, but he was slow as molasses and couldn't really operate more than 10 yards from the LOS. Chig is a significant upgrade in athleticism and explosiveness from the TE position. I really think they went hard after WR with Pierce and Doubs, and when they didn't get either one, instead of signing another mid-tier WR, they went for TE to get a similar type of production, just from a different position.
- The RB position is going to be RB by committee. But I think it's better than 2024. The guy who I think gets lost is Rachaad White, who's a very capable pass-catcher out of the backfield. His best season was 2023, where he was the featured back in Tampa, and he had 990 yards rushing and 550 yards receiving. Even last year, as a backup, he had 572 yards rushing and 218 yards passing. They also have Bill, the guy they drafted, and a few other guys. The moment they signed White I thought it was because they are going to use some 2 RB sets, and use him as a receiver out of the backfield.
Which
I really think the difference is going to be the way the offense is constructed. I think Blough is going to run the offense through the running game, and then through the middle of the field. That's the Ben Johnson style. Which de-emphasizes the outside WRs, and emphasizes the RBs, TE's and slot WRs. Which is why they drafted Williams.

The one place where I completely agree with you, they NEED McLaurin to stay healthy, and they're placing a big bet on that. I personally wouldn't make that bet. And if it doesn't happen, there really isn't a good replacement for him at all. Last year at least they had Deebo. Who isn't at all that guy, but is at least big, strong, tough, competitive and an NFL starting WR caliber WR. They don't have that guy if Terry gets hurt, and THAT is a huge, enormous, mega risk.

Which is why I would actually sign Diggs over Aiyuk. Whether they will or not is yet to be seen. I have no idea if Aiyuk could fill in if Terry gets hurt. He might be able to. But he hasn't played a game since a horrific knee injury in 2024, and he's been a head case ever since. I know Diggs could step into the role.

I know the reporting isn't leading that way. So we'll see.

I don’t really agree with the OL being better.

It might be, but idk.

We downgraded at center, imo.

Paul is Paul. Was meh to begin with.

Cosmi is not a top 10 RG, imo. He has not been for awhile, either.

Conerly ended really well but struggled for a significant portion of the season.

Tunsil is the only definitive beast up front. I’d say Cosmi is next. Then Conerly. Then Allegretti. Then Paul.

RB room is better.

I’m not sure about tight end. As of their previous NFL production: Chig = Ertz. I think Chig will be > 2025 Ertz, though. But for this to be a real + situation Sinnott has to make a leap.

Receiver is big time problematic and no amount of hand waving is going to make it go away. A hole at WR2 is not a good spot to have a hole on the roster.

We’ll see. The team is banking on the hope and prayer method.
 
I don’t really agree with the OL being better.

It might be, but idk.

We downgraded at center, imo.

Paul is Paul. Was meh to begin with.

Cosmi is not a top 10 RG, imo. He has not been for awhile, either.

Conerly ended really well but struggled for a significant portion of the season.

Tunsil is the only definitive beast up front. I’d say Cosmi is next. Then Conerly. Then Allegretti. Then Paul.

RB room is better.

I’m not sure about tight end. As of their previous NFL production: Chig = Ertz. I think Chig will be > 2025 Ertz, though. But for this to be a real + situation Sinnott has to make a leap.

Receiver is big time problematic and no amount of hand waving is going to make it go away. A hole at WR2 is not a good spot to have a hole on the roster.

We’ll see. The team is banking on the hope and prayer method.

I think he was comparing to 2024 unless I misunderstood his post.
 
I think he was comparing to 2024 unless I misunderstood his post.
Ah I might have missed that.

RB room is worse in that case. So is receiver. OZ was terrific for us. OL I’d argue is worse, too.

QB should be better, WR1 equal, TE about equal, Center is worse.

The hope is the offense grows under Blough and we stay healthy. One injury to Tunsil, Jayden or McLaurin and we’re in trouble. And yes, I do know you can say that about those three positions on any team… but for this team there really isn’t any hope of any of those guys goes down.

I guess Tunsil is ironically the best suited guy to go down because Conerly can kick to left and Turnstile Wiley can play RT. So we may be best equipped for that.

Jayden is ironically less of an issue than Terry. Mariota can win games.

If Terry goes down, in the current WR situation we are DOA
 
I really don't think they are.

I think they see him as a low risk/high reward gamble if it ever materializes, and they'd be kindof fine if it didn't materialize. Jayden Daniels wants to play with his buddy, so bringing him in to give him a shot, given how good he was, isn't a bad idea.

But I think that's all it is. I don't think they're counting on him. I think some of the "they have interest" has been massively overblown by outside sources. Do they have interest? Maybe some. If I had to guess, I'd bet that Jayden's interest (and Aiyuk's interest) is higher than Peters' interest. But Peters also doesn't want to just say "no" and irritate his starting QB, and if it's low risk, then why the hell not bring him in for a shot?

If Peters is concerned about the WR room, he would have signed somebody by now. And they might shock the world and sign Diggs. But I don't think they are planning on Aiyuk coming in and "saving the day." Coming in and showing he can play would be the bar.

I think some of this is off, some of it is right.

They clearly saw WR as a need, chasing Doubs and Pierce in FA.

As far a legit interest in Aiyuk, its about as clear as I can ever recall interest in a player lol before he was available. Everybody around this team, local or national have a strong vibe that they do, including heavy hitters like Schefter and Keim. There are zero dissenters. And Peters himself IMO did a poor poker job of hiding his interest when asked about him in the combine.

But I do agree with your point that they don't see Aiyuk as "saving the day". It's kind of how they roll at that spot. It's like me driving my car there are some things that bother me less than other things and some that bother me more. I am not the type to rush to a mechanic to do an oil change after 5000 miles but if the air in my tire is down, am right at the gas station taking care of it. I have gotten flat tires in the past, so I've learned via pain to not test the issue. It feels to me that we are on that ride with Peters at WR.

Wr is sort of Peters thing where he doesn't sweat it as much as others do. I suspect and I hope am wrong that eventually it burns him and he learns from it. Last year it burned him. And I am sure he's conscious of it potentially happening again but i think he trusts Jayden to overcome shortfalls at the position and hopes that some of his cheap signings at the spot will bring them the next version of Zacceheus.

I don't think its that level binary. But I do understand the philosophy of you can't do everything in an off season. I just hate that the dude they are messing with on that front is Jayden who arguably is the sun-moon of the team. Some will say yeah but helping ANY part of the team helps him. Sure. But giving him protection and weapons are easily the best way to maximize Jayden's growth. And they've only done IMO half the job and three off seasons is enough time to get it done.
 
Last edited:
Ah I might have missed that.

RB room is worse in that case. So is receiver. OZ was terrific for us. OL I’d argue is worse, too.

QB should be better, WR1 eq70, 85 and 51 ual, TE about equal, Center is worse.

The hope is the offense grows under Blough and we stay healthy. One injury to Tunsil, Jayden or McLaurin and we’re in trouble. And yes, I do know you can say that about those three positions on any team… but for this team there really isn’t any hope of any of those guys goes down.

I guess Tunsil is ironically the best suited guy to go down because Conerly can kick to left and Turnstile Wiley can play RT. So we may be best equipped for that.

Jayden is ironically less of an issue than Terry. Mariota can win games.

If Terry goes down, in the current WR situation we are DOA
I know you're down on the Center thing. I personally think it's entirely overblown. I don't think Biadasz was really all that. He was also hurt all the time, played through it though. He wasn't a good run blocker, and picked some fantastic times to completely wiff on inside moves. Standig was on this one early, questioning whether there could be a move there. I don't think it will be addition by subtraction, but I'm not sure it's going to be a drop-off either. My general guess is it's going to hold about the same as it's been. But then, I was never extremely high on Biadasz. And clearly the team thought there was something really not right with the OL last year because they jettisoned both Biadasz and the OL coach. That's actually very interesting. Overall, the OL is better than in 2024 just because of the presence of Tunsil. Having a top 3 LT does wonders for an OL. Paul is competent, Cosmi is the same, and Connerly Jr. looks really good at RT.

Compare that to Coleman, Allegretti, Biadasz, Cosmi and Wylie. Tunsil > Coleman, Connerly > Wylie. Cosmi is constant. LG is going to be a push or upgrade with either Paul or Coleman. So the question is center. Even if it's a little less (and I'm not sure it's even that), then you still have a better starting group in 2026 than in 2024.

I think TE is different, not necessarily better or worse. Ertz was good in small spaces and red zone. He knew how to use his body and get open. But he was slow as a slug, got zero YAC, and didn't draw coverage away from anyone. Chig is the opposite of all of those things. I think you might see a dropoff in redzone efficiency from TE, but they're counting on a big uptick in stretching the field vertically from the middle of the field.

I absolutely disagree with you about the RB room with a caveat: the best RB we've had on the team the last 2 years has been Ekler. But he got hurt and missed more than half the games in both seasons. Somebody of his caliber is not on the roster. But was he really on the roster for the last 2 year? Only kindof. Brian Robinson is replacement level ok. Nothing spectacular. Chris Rodriguez wasn't even that good. White is better than both of them. The combination of White and Bill is better than anything we've had (Absent Ekler), and it's not really that close. And this Kaytron Allen guy might be a really suitable CRod replacement, and maybe even a better CRod. You have to see with Rookies. I think there's no question the RB room is better than 2024.

For WR, I think the passage of time has made the 2024 group look better than they were. And I think this group is as good as that group, probably better.
- OZ really didn't start doing anything of note for the team until week 14. He had 2 good games before then (Arizona - 6/85, @NYG - 2/45.) Other than that, he didn't have a single game with more than 30 yards until week 14. Then he had games for 35, 70, 85, 51. He did ok in the playoffs, though had 0 yards on 2 targets in the game in Detroit. He was good down the stretch after Noah Brown got hurt.
- Noah Brown. Week 14 is the first week Noah Brown missed due to injury. Which correlates exactly to when OZ and DBrown started to produce. Up until that point, Brown was unquestionably the most productive WR other than Terry. ** Which is probably why he was re-signed and OZ was not, though I think that was a bad decision.
- Diyami Brown also didn't do a ton up until Noah Brown got hurt, then he started to do well. And by not a ton, I mean like virtually nothing. Though his best production of the season was the playoffs, and that wasn't close, he went for 89,98 and 42 yards. I think he had more targets/catches/yards in the playoffs than he did the entire rest of the season. He also had a crushing fumble against Philly in the NFC Championship game.
- McCaffery did virtually squat, so he's not worth breaking down.

But the thought that that group of Noah Brown, OZ or DBrown was really that good is not really based in what happened. It might feel that way, but it really wasn't that way. They were ok. OZ and DBrown did almost jack diddly squat until NBrown got hurt.

Do I think this year's "other guys" in the "Terry and those other guys" is at least as good as that group? I see no reason why they couldn't be. Diyami is back, so that's a constant. They have McCaffery in year 3, Lane in year 2, just drafted what most analysts think is a guy who can start right away in Williams, they have Van Jefferson as a professional WR (think Noah Brown) type guy. In fact, Van Jefferson might just be a very slightly better Noah Brown.

1779555294762.png


What we don't have this year, and we didn't have in 2024, is any answer if Terry goes down. Which in 2024 he didn't, so that question didn't have to get answered. He did in 2025, and we had only a partial answer in Deebo. If we have to answer that question in 2026, it's a disaster.

Anyway, I don't think the 2024 "those guys" are really any better than the 2026 version of "those guys."
 
Receiver is big time problematic and no amount of hand waving is going to make it go away. A hole at WR2 is not a good spot to have a hole on the roster.
I actually really disagree with this. If you're going to have a weakness on a roster, WR2 might be the best place to have it. A good OC can cover that up as long as you have other weapons in other places. And that's especially true if you have a good slot WR.

I'd much rather have a weakness at WR than CB2, for example. Which we might have. I'm more worried about the secondary than WR. Good OCs (and we don't know if Blough is a good OC or not) can work around some deficiences. If you have a WR1, versatile RBs, and a good TE, you should be fine.

My bigger concern at WR has much less to do with lining up with who we've got day 1. My concern is if Terry gets hurt, the drop off on the outside is absolutely huge. Which is why I'd just sign Diggs and be done with it. But they seem to want to bed on Terry's health. That's not a bet I would place. But it's one they seem to be placing.
 
I actually really disagree with this. If you're going to have a weakness on a roster, WR2 might be the best place to have it. A good OC can cover that up as long as you have other weapons in other places. And that's especially true if you have a good slot WR.

I'd much rather have a weakness at WR than CB2, for example. Which we might have. I'm more worried about the secondary than WR. Good OCs (and we don't know if Blough is a good OC or not) can work around some deficiences. If you have a WR1, versatile RBs, and a good TE, you should be fine.

My bigger concern at WR has much less to do with lining up with who we've got day 1. My concern is if Terry gets hurt, the drop off on the outside is absolutely huge. Which is why I'd just sign Diggs and be done with it. But they seem to want to bed on Terry's health. That's not a bet I would place. But it's one they seem to be placing.

Even if I ran with this premise.

If you don't have a legit #2, its not really debatable that your offense is more vulnerable if you lose your #1 than the typical team. Grant Paulsen who seems to be on the same page with you -- even he agrees with this point.

The reason why Terry had a contract impasse last summer was centered on the idea that the data shows WRs once hitting 30 tend to be more injury prone, take longer to heal and their production drops off.

So Terry turns 30 and got injured, took him a long time to heal and his production dropped. He ironically was the poster child to the 30 something WR.

So to assume one year older, we are out of the woods with Terry is a big presumption right? He's just as likely to get injured and his production dropping off than last year if not more.

So going on that ride where the whole offense is held hostage to a 31 year old WR staying in peak form and avoiding injury is risky.
 
Not having a #2 presents two problems.

A. Teams can bracket and shut down the #1, ala what the Eagles sometimes do to Terry, without fear of getting burned on the other side

B. Any team suffers when they lose the #1, but most have the luxury of having a #2 that can threaten a defense enough to become the #1 in a pinch -- when you don't have that guy, you got the 2025 season.
You don't have to have the WR2 as the person who pulls coverage. It can be anybody who's good at creating separation and explosive plays.

This is actually the premise of play action. You show run action to draw players up towards the LOS to pull coverage away from deeper breaking routes. So run game, TE, play action, all of those things are meant to do what you are saying. You can accomplish it in multiple ways.

For example, look at the 2023 Lions.
1779557441637.png


The first time you see an outside WR is #5 on the list at Josh Reynolds.

They used the running game, slot WR and TE as their primary targets.

I'm not saying we have any of those level of players, but what I am saying is, there are multiple ways to approach offense.
 
If you don't have a legit #2, its not really debatable that your offense is more vulnerable if you lose your #1 than the typical team. Grant Paulsen who seems to be on the same page with you -- even he agrees with this point.
And I've literally never said otherwise.

I've always said the biggest issue is if Terry goes down, the drop-off might be insurmoutable. Which is why I think they should sign Diggs and not screw with Aiyuk. I've said that a lot. The Diggs part is new because he wasn't practically available until his court case wrapped up this week. But for months I've said they need another guy who can play outside as an insurance policy in case Terry goes down and we don't have to call up Chosen or Burks again.

Never had any disagreement on this point. Ever.

EDIT: However, if Terry doesn't go down and is as productive as in 2024 (both big IFs), then I think this skill position group + OL are better than 2024. Not by a huge margin, but I think OL and RB are definitively better, and I think TE is going to be more explosive, however if you want to call it a push, I'm fine with that, and I'd take the 2026 "other guys" at this point over the 2024 "other guys." This isn't my ideal desire. I'd prefer they would have landed one of the top WRs in FA, or drafted Tate (he was taken earlier and they might not have done it anyway), but they didn't, and you can't change that. So we're stuck with WR2 by committee, and I do think that committee is better than 2024's, at least on paper right now.

If Williams is productive as a rookie, it wouldn't be even close, but we have to see that first.

Again, for me: (=> means compares to)
Van Jefferson => Noah Brown
Diyami Brown => Diyami Brown
McCaffery => McCaffery
OZ => Burks or one of the other guys
Williams is the wildcard, they didn't have a slot like him.
 
Last edited:
You don't have to have the WR2 as the person who pulls coverage. It can be anybody who's good at creating separation and explosive plays.

This is actually the premise of play action. You show run action to draw players up towards the LOS to pull coverage away from deeper breaking routes. So run game, TE, play action, all of those things are meant to do what you are saying. You can accomplish it in multiple ways.

For example, look at the 2023 Lions.
View attachment 14962

The first time you see an outside WR is #5 on the list at Josh Reynolds.

They used the running game, slot WR and TE as their primary targets.

I'm not saying we have any of those level of players, but what I am saying is, there are multiple ways to approach offense.

600 plus yards is #2 category type numbers and we got another one with 500 plus years. That's actually good albiet not great. How many 600 yard seasons have you seen from Luke or Dyami?

Also, Jameson Williams is a legit #2, he was coming back from injury so they were easing him into it, he ended up with 1000 yards regularly afterwards. Laporta is a monster TE. Gibbs is a top 3 RB.

You aren't running play action on every play.

Your point though brings my criticism home well. Some hyperbole to bring a point home from me and this isn't directed purely at you but some of the other posts combined from others especially from the few in the local media who defend it. I hear these explantions of how Blough will scheme it up different. Or heck the RB will catch 100 balls. Or watch Chig turn into this 800-1000 yard stud. Or name that narrative that is about excitment-projection and a heavy does of homerism.

I can come up with exciting narratives for just about any spot. Lets take safety. Why can't Nick Cross become like Ed Reed? He has the speed. He's still young. He's driven. He had a lot of tackles. Quan is a stud, it was Whitt holding him back. Yeah Will Harris hasn't put up great career numbers but this team loves him, he's smart and heck under a Daronte Jones system, he can have 5 picks.

RB -- Croskey-Merritt is just touching his potential. Watch for 1500 yards next season from him considering he's perfectly suited to this outside zone scheme, one cut and boom, do you recall that run against Dallas? -- and watching Blough scheme it up for him in a way that will ensure he explodes.

The whole thought process to me feels very Rivera style roster building as to where every concern is answered by either some superior coaching advantage the team has or with the idea that the most optimistic hope and dream of every player comes true.

Look, I don't think its the opposite either. But in year 1 i am not counting on some play action scheme from Blough that will transcend the need for a #2, or my fondest hopes for every player comes true.

The seasons from our experience rarely play out like that. However, I am famiilliar with the feeling of every hope-dream-possibility plays out perfectly. As a younger fan, I could feel that way. But lol I've become more cynical on that as I've gotten older. Often my concerns about the team do blow up on them, not always, but often enough. And that's not because my concerns are that insightful. It's because they are stating the obvious. Not just me, others have expressed similar concerns. I among others expressed this exact same concerns last summer.

I can recall like yesterday, some fans and beat guys around the team explaining how us fans were wrong about the concerns about the O line under Ron -- with the idea again of us not properly factoring "scheme" , the power of cohesion with the sum of its parts exceeding each individual and having too little faith in the development of players among other things. I can cite plenty of other examples like that.
 
Last edited:
And I've literally never said otherwise.

I've always said the biggest issue is if Terry goes down, the drop-off might be insurmoutable. Which is why I think they should sign Diggs and not screw with Aiyuk. I've said that a lot. The Diggs part is new because he wasn't practically available until his court case wrapped up this week. But for months I've said they need another guy who can play outside as an insurance policy in case Terry goes down and we don't have to call up Chosen or Burks again.

Never had any disagreement on this point. Ever.

EDIT: However, if Terry doesn't go down and is as productive as in 2024 (both big IFs), then I think this skill position group + OL are better than 2024. Not by a huge margin, but I think OL and RB are definitively better, and I think TE is going to be more explosive, however if you want to call it a push, I'm fine with that, and I'd take the 2026 "other guys" at this point over the 2024 "other guys." This isn't my ideal desire. I'd prefer they would have landed one of the top WRs in FA, or drafted Tate (he was taken earlier and they might not have done it anyway), but they didn't, and you can't change that. So we're stuck with WR2 by committee, and I do think that committee is better than 2024's, at least on paper right now.

If Williams is productive as a rookie, it wouldn't be even close, but we have to see that first.

Again, for me: (=> means compares to)
Van Jefferson => Noah Brown
Diyami Brown => Diyami Brown
McCaffery => McCaffery
OZ => Burks or one of the other guys
Williams is the wildcard, they didn't have a slot like him.

I didn't say you disagreed with the point. But you clearly can't seem to be that worried about the point concerning you doubling down that the "best" place to have a weakness on the roster is the #2 WR.
 
Honestly wouldn't mind if they signed Diggs with idea that he and Aiyuk would split time at the two. I think Diggs on a snap count makes a lot of sense. Frankly, Aiyuk after two years off, probably ought to be on a snap count too. Together, they might make one really good receiver.
 
I guess Tunsil is ironically the best suited guy to go down because Conerly can kick to left and Turnstile Wiley can play RT. So we may be best equipped for that.

Jayden is ironically less of an issue than Terry. Mariota can win games.

If Terry goes down, in the current WR situation we are DOA

Yeah basically they got the deepest collection of #4 Wrs in the NFL. You can survive that if Terry stays healthy but I can't think of a team that is more dependant on one player on offense the way this team depends on Terry. So if they lose him everything can fall apart.

I know some seem to think Croskey-Merrit verges on being a great back, just short of the elite backs in the league and can carry this team as a RB. But lol i know you and I among others don't think he's an emerging superstar. And the RB room is solid. But likely have problems if the opposing defense locks into to stopping the run.

I think one of the unintended consequences of Jayden not having many weapons is they need to depend on him running more. If they play man, Jayden can run a bit more to exploit that. If no one is open take off, etc.

But my point for those who say improving the defense does as much if not more for Jayden then giving him weapons -- I don't think so myself -- and among other things it puts him more at risk.
 
Sure looks like we do
Eh, I haven't heard anybody from the team say anything about it really. Granted, they can't because Aiyuk is under contract with the 49ers so saying anything would be tampering. However, to me, what it really feels like is Aiyuk's agent is feeding information to Schefter and others to try and make it appear as though there's a lot of interest. Otherwise, the team has been absolutely silent on it. I know, I know, some of the beat reporters have said there is interest.

You also have to ask yourself, why would the team let anybody know they had interest? What's in it for them? The only thing they get out of that information getting out is weakening their negotiating position either with the 49ers or with Aiyuk on a future contract. I've been somewhat skeptical of the voracity of this reporting for ages. It REALLY feels like the sources are outside the building. And saying, "they would have interest" is completely safe.

I have interest in a lot of things. Sometimes that interest turns into something I'd pursue, and sometimes it's just a raised eyebrow.

I think a lot of the swirl is fan and media driven.
 

Commanders are stuck in a tricky window as Jayden Daniels timeline ticks​

Kevin Sheehan of The Team 980 argues that, despite an offseason that brought edge rusher Odafe Oweh, tight end Chig Okonkwo, rookie linebacker Sonny Styles, and plenty more to Washington, the team still can't settle.

After all, there's a playoff spot to push for.


"This team needs more good football players, that's the bottom line. Unless you're living in this world of "Let's try to win 7 or 8 games, then try to advance to 9 or 10 games, then maybe by 2029 we'll be a Super Bowl contender," that's not the way the NFL works anymore."

Sheehan didn't specifically mention Washington's wide receiver room, but that is where all the talk has been centered in recent weeks. With veterans such as Brandon Aiyuk and Stefon Diggs linked to the Commanders, it feels like Peters has to make a move to signal that this team is serious about competing.

This isn't the NBA or MLB. Just because the Commanders were bad last year with an aging roster, it doesn't mean they have to be bad for another half-decade while stockpiling draft picks.

 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 10, Members: 1, Guests: 9)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top