For a Troubled Organization, Blame Resides at the Top
By Sally Jenkins
Thursday, October 1, 2009
The Redskins are full of talk about personal responsibility this week, mouthing all the right words and saying they can still turn things around if they are individually accountable and stick together. But my question is, how much can a team really subscribe to personal responsibility when the guy who is by far the most responsible for the state of the franchise, the owner, ducks it?
For a decade now, Daniel Snyder has made an utter mess of the team, and yet he seldom, if ever, takes responsibility for it. He operates from behind a phalanx of security, proxies and media managers, routinely declining to comment and be accountable. He wants all the fun when they win and none of the blame when they lose.
Click on the link below for the remainder-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/30/AR2009093004775.html
By Sally Jenkins
Thursday, October 1, 2009
The Redskins are full of talk about personal responsibility this week, mouthing all the right words and saying they can still turn things around if they are individually accountable and stick together. But my question is, how much can a team really subscribe to personal responsibility when the guy who is by far the most responsible for the state of the franchise, the owner, ducks it?
For a decade now, Daniel Snyder has made an utter mess of the team, and yet he seldom, if ever, takes responsibility for it. He operates from behind a phalanx of security, proxies and media managers, routinely declining to comment and be accountable. He wants all the fun when they win and none of the blame when they lose.
Click on the link below for the remainder-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/30/AR2009093004775.html