• Welcome to BGO! We know you will have questions as you become familiar with the software. Please take a moment to read our New BGO User Guide which will give you a great start. If you have questions, post them in the Feedback and Tech Support Forum, or feel free to message any available Staff Member.

Today's Inactives

Boone

The Commissioner
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joined
Apr 11, 2009
Messages
50,085
Reaction score
7,832
Points
3,044
Location
Greensboro, NC
Military Branch
Marine Corps
Alma Mater
Virginia
Dec. 9, 2012

ANNOUNCEMENT OF INACTIVES


LANDOVER, Md. – The teams have announced the following inactives and lineup changes for today’s game between the Washington Redskins and Baltimore Ravens:

For the Washington Redskins:
- No. 8 QB Rex Grossman
- No. 16 WR Brandon Banks
- No. 19 WR Dezmon Briscoe
- No. 55 LB Roddrick Muckelroy
- No. 67 OL Josh LeRibeus
- No. 68 T Tom Compton
- No. 73 G Adam Gettis

For the Baltimore Ravens:
- No. 22 CB Jimmy Smith
- No. 55 LB Terrell Suggs
- No. 59 LB Dannell Ellerbe
- No. 70 G/T Ramon Harewood
- No. 83 WR/RS Deonte Thompson
- No. 84 TE Ed Dickson
- No. 95 DT Bryan Hall

No. 51 Brendon Ayanbadejo is expected to start in place of No. 59 Dannell Ellerbe at Will linebacker.
No. 88 Dennis Pitta is expected to start in place of No. 84 Ed Dickson at tight end.
No. 91 Courtney Upshaw is expected to start in place of No. 55 Terrell Suggs at Rush linebacker.
 
So who returns kicks? Robinson? Crawford is probably too risky.
 
On another note, Briscoe is becoming a disappointment. All of the former Bucs players seem to be heading that way.
 
I am SO glad not to have to watch Banks making stupid decisions out there today. He will not be missed today.
 
Have LeRibeus & Gettis been inactive all season? Who comes in at G if there's a, you know what?
 
Reportedly, Paul and Royster will return kickoffs.

Crawford will return punts. If true, that's risky on the punts.
 
No one we put out there is going to be riskier than Banks. My opinion.
 
No one we put out there is going to be riskier than Banks. My opinion.

No fan of Banks, but a wet field and little action seems to be risky for Crawford on punts.

I'd like to see Robinson on punts.
 
Why risky for Crawford? No doubt he has been doing it in practice and he has a lot of game experience doing it in college. I'm not seeing him as any riskier than Banks. Less so, in fact.
 
THANK BABY JESUS. So tired of seeing Banks out there! Let's hope Paul or Crawford has a TD return today and makes him completely irrelevant!
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
 
Why risky for Crawford? No doubt he has been doing it in practice and he has a lot of game experience doing it in college. I'm not seeing him as any riskier than Banks. Less so, in fact.

I see a wet field, and little game action as a risky combo. Practice is one thing, but it's not the real thing.

Let's hope he rocks.
 
So who returns kicks? Robinson? Crawford is probably too risky.
Reportedly, Paul and Royster will return kickoffs.

Crawford will return punts. If true, that's risky on the punts.
I see a wet field, and little game action as a risky combo. Practice is one thing, but it's not the real thing.

Let's hope he rocks.

Oh all of ye of little faith. :)
 
Oh all of ye of little faith. :)




lol



Crawford MAY have sent Banks on the road to a new home. I can see them letting Crawford have another crack at it next week... and if he does anywhere near what he did this week, and doesn't have a huge brain fart or horrible fumble.. Banks' tenure may be done.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users
As we enjoy today's conversations, let's remember our dear friends 'Docsandy', Sandy Zier-Teitler, and 'Posse Lover', Michael Huffman, who would dearly love to be here with us today! We love and miss you guys ❤

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top