Not going to apologize for starting this thread. If that is the attitude for Redskins fans, then they deserve a bunch of losers on the roster. FAs and potential draftees lurk in places that we may not realize and when they see an attitude like this on the internet, then we should not be surprised when they would prefer to play elsewhere.
Wow...so where did this come from, brother?
I don't understand the "apology" angle at all....what we've done is take the original thought to its logical next step, i.e., asking if London Fletcher, at this point in his career, is a smart re-sign for the Redskins. And it's not like it's an easy answer question either way since, as far as I know, at this point we have no inkling as to the likely cost.
As to the other things you seem to be suggesting---
1) that anyone who doesn't back the idea of re-signing a 37 year-old ILB, regardless of cost, "deserves a bunch of losers on the roster," and
2) that FA's around the league might choose not to come here because they happened to read some people on a message board questionning whether resigning that 37 year old ILB regardless of cost is not worthy of discussion
... are you serious?
 }})
