Pravda
Guest
After what's been a pretty impressive -- improbable even after 3-6? -- run of wins, it go me thinking about who in the press corps might have had us as division leaders at any point in the season, much less leading the division with two games to go in sole control of our fate to win the division(!!):
New York Times Predicted Finish: 4th NFC East.
The Washington Examiner thought we'd be 6-10.
CBS thought we'd be 3-13.
ESPN the Magazine thought we'd be 2-14.
Sports Illustrated had us at 6-10.
Hell, our own coach after Week 9 -- though he later recanted his views -- was ready to give up on this season.
It's not hard to see why -- we've been, with some real bright spots during Gibbs II, more of a punch line than a respected opponent that's compared to Superman, no less -- for more than 20 years.
I think we've experienced a sea change in not just the perception of the Redskins by the fans and the media, but more broadly in how the team views itself:
Can you imagine saying that about a Spurrier team that lost 10 of it's last 12 before he resigned in disgrace and retired from football? What about a Zorn team that had to hire consultants in early October(!!) and threaten to strip play calling away from their losing coach?
We may not be a step away from the Super Bowl. We may not be one player away from a 14-2 season. But given how we all, or almost all, thought about ourselves, prior to this season, it's a pretty remarkable shift in expectations and performance.
And that's after we almost capsized more than halfway into this season.
We're in first in the NFC East and could win it (and host a playoff game) for the first time since 1999, and the second time since we won the Super Bowl in 1991.
That's a big deal: we're damn close to being relevant and a legitimate threat in the playoff race. How long has it been since we could have honestly said that about a Redskins team?
Wow. I think I've finally beat my Norvitis.
New York Times Predicted Finish: 4th NFC East.
The Washington Examiner thought we'd be 6-10.
CBS thought we'd be 3-13.
ESPN the Magazine thought we'd be 2-14.
Sports Illustrated had us at 6-10.
Hell, our own coach after Week 9 -- though he later recanted his views -- was ready to give up on this season.
It's not hard to see why -- we've been, with some real bright spots during Gibbs II, more of a punch line than a respected opponent that's compared to Superman, no less -- for more than 20 years.
I think we've experienced a sea change in not just the perception of the Redskins by the fans and the media, but more broadly in how the team views itself:
ESPN said:
Can you imagine saying that about a Spurrier team that lost 10 of it's last 12 before he resigned in disgrace and retired from football? What about a Zorn team that had to hire consultants in early October(!!) and threaten to strip play calling away from their losing coach?
We may not be a step away from the Super Bowl. We may not be one player away from a 14-2 season. But given how we all, or almost all, thought about ourselves, prior to this season, it's a pretty remarkable shift in expectations and performance.
And that's after we almost capsized more than halfway into this season.
We're in first in the NFC East and could win it (and host a playoff game) for the first time since 1999, and the second time since we won the Super Bowl in 1991.
That's a big deal: we're damn close to being relevant and a legitimate threat in the playoff race. How long has it been since we could have honestly said that about a Redskins team?
Wow. I think I've finally beat my Norvitis.
Last edited by a moderator: