- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 50,897
- Reaction score
- 9,117
- Points
- 3,044
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
As I watched Friday's draft activity, and my beloved Skins trading down, down, down...I moved from encouraged to concerned. More does not equal better - that was my mindset. Yes, there are exceptions to the rule that the higher the round selected the more the player's promise - but my confidence in the Redskins ability to find solid mid to late round talent has been shaken over the years.
That being said, I think Henry (yes, our Henry) was correct when he chided me earlier today for criticizing what should have been a welcome departure from the failed draft strategies of the past.
Looking at the guys we drafted after I raised the red flag about potentially excessive trade downs:
4 105 Roy Helu RB Nebraska
5 146 Dejon Gomes DB Nebraska
5 155 Niles Paul WR Nebraska
6 177 Evan Royster RB Penn State
6 178 Aldrick Robinson WR Southern Methodist
7 213 Brandyn Thompson DB Boise State
7 217 Maurice Hurt T Florida
7 224 Markus White DE Florida State
7 253 Chris Neild DT West Virginia
We got a couple of RB's whom there seems little doubt Shanahan will work his magic on (I'm guessing at least one of them sticks, and possibly both), we found a couple of value WR's, one of whom (Robinson) will almost certainly be a special teams standout, and we found more potential help for a defense that was woefully porous in 2010.
I have major concerns about the offensive line, and the fact that Maurice Hurt was our only o-line draftee. But as Om pointed out - we must have plans in Free Agency to address needs there, and as others have rightfully stated - we weren't going to fill all our needs in this draft.
All in all, I have to say that brother Henry may well have been right. This may have been the best-managed and most disciplined and well thought out draft in a decade. When the sports mediots are giving you props, you know you didn't have a bad draft.
All Hail Henry
That being said, I think Henry (yes, our Henry) was correct when he chided me earlier today for criticizing what should have been a welcome departure from the failed draft strategies of the past.
Looking at the guys we drafted after I raised the red flag about potentially excessive trade downs:
4 105 Roy Helu RB Nebraska
5 146 Dejon Gomes DB Nebraska
5 155 Niles Paul WR Nebraska
6 177 Evan Royster RB Penn State
6 178 Aldrick Robinson WR Southern Methodist
7 213 Brandyn Thompson DB Boise State
7 217 Maurice Hurt T Florida
7 224 Markus White DE Florida State
7 253 Chris Neild DT West Virginia
We got a couple of RB's whom there seems little doubt Shanahan will work his magic on (I'm guessing at least one of them sticks, and possibly both), we found a couple of value WR's, one of whom (Robinson) will almost certainly be a special teams standout, and we found more potential help for a defense that was woefully porous in 2010.
I have major concerns about the offensive line, and the fact that Maurice Hurt was our only o-line draftee. But as Om pointed out - we must have plans in Free Agency to address needs there, and as others have rightfully stated - we weren't going to fill all our needs in this draft.
All in all, I have to say that brother Henry may well have been right. This may have been the best-managed and most disciplined and well thought out draft in a decade. When the sports mediots are giving you props, you know you didn't have a bad draft.
All Hail Henry