Tom in NY said:
I blame the media and their unwillingness to understand this issue.
The easy story is "it was an uncapped year, therefore no rules." Unfortunately, it takes a few moments of reading and understanding basic accounting to get why the cowboys and redskins were found to have cheated.
It was NOT a matter of what teams spent in salaries or signing bonuses in 2010, but rather that these two teams decided to write off exorbitant previous bonuses into the 2010 year, thus freeing MORE cap space than they were entitled to in 2011 and future years. The league agreed, ahead of 2010 NOT to do this so that teams were not given a competitive advantage, and must fairly feel the effects of previous years of spending.
By the fact that 30 other teams agreed not to do these accounting tricks tells the story.
There is no "collusion" as it was not about $$ spent, but how the accounting would be handled.
But why would we expect anyone from the media to, you know, read and attempt to comprehend when it is far easier to create a sensationalist story.
I wonder if this is the old Tom from ES? He's the only one who put any kind of rational thought into his response.
<Stephen A. Smith> HOWEVAH </Stephen A. Smith>
His argument has one basic flaw - we COULD have done the Haynesworth move in any year, and the cap would have accelerated to that year, not spread out over several like he seems to think. He is confused with CUTTING Haynesworth, which would create dead cap spread out over several years.
If they'd traded him in 2009, when the Titans wanted him for a 3rd rounder, the entire $36M or whatever would have accelerated to that year. This is why we did NOT trade him, b/c there was a salary cap and they could not afford to.
Lo' and behold, the NFL & the NFLPA can't agree on a deal and boom: uncapped year. The Redskins did not design this uncapped year. The Redskins did not create this uncapped year. But you're damn right a saavy business man like Snyder is going to take advantage of every loophole he can!
And to those of you saying "Oh, this is just Snyder's comeuppance for his wreckless spending over there years," give me a BREAK. He's done all his spending within the cap up until this point, at some times hamstringing himself. Were they bad contracts? Sure. Were they within the rules outlined by the former CBA? One hundred percent. So you can be angry about the previous spending sprees (I am...they were stupid), but the bottom line is that it was an UNCAPPED year.
If you're going to punish the Redskins, go right ahead. But then you have to hold every other NFL team to the same standards. Take a look at the contract breakdown for Julius Peppers:
Year Base Signing Misc Cap Hit
2010 900,000 1,083,000 12,800,000
14,783,000
2011 900,000 3,183,000 100,000 4,183,000
2012 8,900,000 3,183,000 100,000 12,183,000
2013 12,900,000 3,183,000 100,000 16,183,000
2014 13,900,000 3,183,000 100,000 17,183,000
2015 16,500,000 3,183,000 - 19,683,000
Fairly soon we will hear about how Julius Peppers has restructured his contract, to turn his base salary into a signing bonus this year and spread out the cap hit. Sound familiar? It should...its been Snyder's M-O for YEARS.
EDIT: And that doesn't even address the 10 or so teams who spent BELOW the salary cap floor, ALSO a violation of the previous and present CBAs. Where are there punishments?