More...Perhaps the most compelling question, if not the most important, is what will new head coach Mike Shanahan do on draft day ...?
Absolutely not! Mi casa su casa.Om said:Hope you don't mind that I took the liberty ...
Unfortunately, this position was labeled differently depending on who you asked. Some places called a guy a DB, others would call that same guy a CB. Worse, some sites referred to a safety a DB, others referred to that same guy a S, and another site would call him a SS. Because of this lack of standardization, it seemed to make the most sense to just combine them all under one umbrella, though that certainly did spike the DB totals on the quantity graph. Wasn't too worried about it since the primary focus was QB and OT.Neophyte said:If I were to quibble with anything, it is that you rolled the S and CB positions into an all inclusive DB slot while breaking everything else out. Wonder if it changes any when those positions are considered independently?
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.servumtuum said:Thanks a lot for the statistical breakdown, Aston. I was really hoping someone would do something like this, it provides essential information for armchair prognosticators. It's obvious you put a lot of effort into this and, believe me, it is well appreciated. Good job indeed!
I figured it was something like that. Bummer too because I can see CB potentially grading out nearly as high as T in this thing. Besides QB and pass rushing DE, T and CB are the two most sought after positions going. It is just possible that the inclusion of S, a position typically left for later in the draft like C unless you have a freak like Ed Reed or Sean Taylor available, drug down the CB numbers. However, you can only work with what you have.Unfortunately, this position was labeled differently depending on who you asked. Some places called a guy a DB, others would call that same guy a CB. Worse, some sites referred to a safety a DB, others referred to that same guy a S, and another site would call him a SS. Because of this lack of standardization, it seemed to make the most sense to just combine them all under one umbrella, though that certainly did spike the DB totals on the quantity graph. Wasn't too worried about it since the primary focus was QB and OT.