Lol. There's no reason to get so worked up. Here's where you are obviously wrong:
He's already gone through battles with alcohol, and has lost two NFL jobs because of it. He continues to drink.
Now is that a fact or an opinion?
Exactly. His risk management in both his personal and professional life is bad. That's a fact.
Obviously you've never (based on this statement) had someone very close to you deal with alcoholism. It's on certain levels a chemical dependency that is as close to a drug dependency as you can get. It clouds your judgement and can completely overwhelm your life. He's taken it upon himself to see that what he was doing was not good. He understands that, but to believe that ANYONE who was completely engulfed in alcoholism can easily have zero control of proper 'risk management' type thinking. It doesn't come down to risk with alcoholism. That being said, someone aware of their own personal situation can mature and understand themselves better when not looking through the foggy glasses of dependency. I myself have been put through alcohol counseling, and in the eyes of the court, as well as my counselor, I was as much an alcoholic as the homeless man sitting outside the liquor store. In my moments of drinking I did some really stupid things that I probably should not have survived. I look back on those and understand what I did wrong, and have learned where I personally need to draw lines. To this day I still drink alcohol, I just make sure I have a DD. Does that mean I'm a failure at 'risk management?' I don't believe so, just means I've seen the error of my ways and make sure that I keep track of myself.
Your statement is your opinion. That his alcohol history was the way it was because he CHOSE to take that risk, instead of looking at a guy who very well could have just been learning more about himself the whole time.