fansince62
Guest
It makes no difference what his intentions are, This was a bad decision for any intention.
1. Intention to trade RG3. Well, he just lessened his trade value. Any acquiring team would like to make the decision on this option on their own. Many might not like to take such a huge risk. That's a fail.
2. Intention is to keep RG3 for ten years. That's also a fail. He could have franchised RG3 next season if he played lights out. Max upside savings is $4 million. Max downside risk is $16 million, and a season like the Mara years where we can't possibly compete due to $16 million less on our salary cap. Huge risk, and fail there too.
No one reading this would ever walk into a casino, and risk $16 million to only win $4 million.
It was a bad, high risk and low reward decision under any circumstance.
McD...those bad seasons had a lot more to do with a whole history of bad decisions going back years than just the cap penalty suffered by trying to reduce cap burden in the first place!!!