• Welcome to BGO! We know you will have questions as you become familiar with the software. Please take a moment to read our New BGO User Guide which will give you a great start. If you have questions, post them in the Feedback and Tech Support Forum, or feel free to message any available Staff Member.

Burner's Burning Questions: Week Five Grades

Burgundy Burner

The Commissioner
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
24,183
Reaction score
424
Points
1,113
Location
Memphis, TN
Alma Mater
Virginia
Week Five Grades​


Welcome to week five questions and grades as the Redskins put forth a spirited, but frustrating game against the Seahawks. The loss brought shades of hopefulness and silver linings to dedicated fans of the burgundy and gold and some agonizing moments too. Feel free to offer your own grades, opinions, suggestions, and ideas. Also, we have some questions to close out this fifth week of action.

Let

More...
 
Week Five Grades​

Welcome to week five questions and grades as the Redskins put forth a spirited, but frustrating game against the Seahawks. The loss brought shades of hopefulness and silver linings to dedicated fans of the burgundy and gold and some agonizing moments too. Feel free to offer your own grades, opinions, suggestions, and ideas. Also, we have some questions to close out this fifth week of action.

Let’s take a look at the grades.

Quarterback:
Kirk Cousins had a much improved performance following the Thursday night debacle. He was able to elude the pass rush and passed for nearly 300 yards – all against the best defense in the league.
Grade: B

Running Backs:
The running game was porous as Alfred Morris struggled to churn out very tough yardage. Roy Helu couldn’t get going either, but Seattle was dedicated to shutting down the running attack as they would often stack eight or nine players on the line.
Grade: D

Wide Receivers:
The receivers had a great night and a poor night. Half of this unit was stellar and the other half apparently relaxed during the game in the locker room. DeSean Jackson is everything we hoped he would be and more. Andre Roberts continues to be the perfect third receiver. Where was Pierre Garcon? Silence indeed.
Grade: B-

Tight Ends:
How can you assign a grade to a unit that was all but absent during the game?
Grade: F

Offensive Line:
A much better showing than the previous game was still stymied by a poor performance in the running game. BBQ believes that Tom Compton should be starting over TyPo.
Grade: C

Defensive Line:
When a defense gives up just twenty-seven points to the best team in the league and forces them into many mental mistakes, the initial praise typically falls to the defensive line. Up front, this unit was able to pressure the opposing quarterback with regularity and had him on the run for much of the game.
Grade: B-

Linebackers:
For two weeks this group had failed in all facets of the game. On Monday night, they were only slightly improved. The linebackers looked befuddled at times and did not hold their positions in read option plays. A sack and a few quarterback hurries keep this from being a failing grade.
Grade: D

Cornerbacks:
The corners deserve a good grade this week. Why? It’s simple. While their coverage was not perfect, the opposing quarterback could not find open receivers and he frequently had to scramble while trying to run for first downs.
Grade: B+

Safeties:
The safeties did a fine job overall and didn’t allow the opposing tight end to burn them as we saw in the previous week. No long passes were given up for scores, but this unit was a bit weak in the running game.
Grade: C+

Special Teams:
Tress Way was solid on punts once again. Kai Forbath struggled on kickoffs, but did have one touchback. A failed onsides kick came at a poor time (this was more on the coaches). Forbath did well on the field goals, but Andre Roberts was a non-factor in the return game.
Grade: C+

Coaching:
Not preparing adequately for the read option falls on Jim Haslett. An attempt at an onsides kick at a poor time in the game hampered the team with poor field position for much of the second half. The running game appeared to be out of sync.
Grade: C-

Week five passes into the history books. How would you grade each position and the coaching staff? What are you looking for in the coming week against the Cardinals? Does the play of our secondary in week five leave you feeling a little more encouraged with this unit? Who would you like to see replacing Jim Haslett – assuming this happens at some juncture? Do you want the Redskins to focus on both lines in the upcoming draft and free agency? On to week six!

See you again next week.

Hail to the Redskins!
 
Great calls BB. Maybe you should start grading on a curve? Maybe some of the grades would look a bit better.

RBs didn't enough touches. If it is what you do best probably should not bail out so soon. Definitely on the coaching staff and it does seem to be a recurring theme.
 
I always take suggestions under advisement for any BBQ blog/thread. Thanks for the ideas and input.

This week starts the evaluation of draft prospects. It always begins for me in mid October and goes all the way until the draft in May.
 
Last edited:
Great calls BB. Maybe you should start grading on a curve? Maybe some of the grades would look a bit better.

RBs didn't enough touches. If it is what you do best probably should not bail out so soon. Definitely on the coaching staff and it does seem to be a recurring theme.

We're running the ball a ton. More so than years before. We just aren't getting the same production.

Per Tandler, we averaged 5.25 ypc last season through 5 games. This year it's only 4.13 ypc.

Many more carries this year, but 23 fewer yards a game.
 
I have no idea if that dropoff is due to calling the wrong running plays, if it's poor blocking by the line or the TE, or if it's on the RBs.

It may just also be that we've played some tough defenses, or that opposing teams are stacking the box and challenging us to throw. But we're calling a lot of running plays.
 
It's because Robert is not under center. Morris, behind our line, is easier to defend without the possibility of a running threat at QB.
 
I tend to agree with that Axe. We are definitely a run-first offense, but we may need to emphasize our passing game even more to both the RBs and the WRs until he returns. Helu has looked great catching the ball.
 
IDK if they are running more. Last year, #5 in attempts, this year (so far) #19.
Granted, alot of the time playing from behind but it sure seems like they do pull the plug on the running game pretty quick.

Right now they are passing 65% of the time. IMO these guys need to be running in the low to mid 40 percentile. Like they did last year.
 
Jordan Reed being back today may benefit our running game by keeping the LBs honest. On the other hand, Arizona's expensive CBs have given up some huge games to WRs this season. It's a tough choice as to how to attack them. Garcon getting going would be big for our running game too.
 
Arizona is ranked second in the league in rush defense. Second only behind Seattle.

If you are a believer in "take what the defense gives you" then we may need to open this one up.

Short passes to Helu might have to pick up the slack.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users
As we enjoy today's conversations, let's remember our dear friends 'Docsandy', Sandy Zier-Teitler, and 'Posse Lover', Michael Huffman, who would dearly love to be here with us today! We love and miss you guys ❤

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top