McD5 - these pathetic 'beat reporters' you reference - pretty ridiculous pointing out how they fall over themselves defending the team or towing the party line when compared to the 24/7 epic onslaught of negativity and scorn every other 'media expert' in America has heaped on Snyder, Shanahan, RG3, and the Redskins in general this year. Thank God for at least some tiny little voices of positivity and a contrarian point of view.
There's nothing particularly ominous about a franchise QB's father being on the sidelines for a game. I don't support it - I think the Redskins would have been wise to draw some lines early on and avoid any appearance of favoritism or inappropriate influence. But there's very little hard evidence that RG2, no matter how close to the team he has been or hasn't been, has had any particular influence on anyone or anything. I don't even know that this kind of thing doesn't occur with other teams? Of course, no one seems to care so deeply about other teams, they way they seem to need to focus on the Redskins
I also find the totally incongruent arguments people are making interesting. Shanahan is impervious to input, stubborn, and an egomaniac. But we're obsessively worried that RG2 has had inappropriate influence on Redskins decision-making. Which is it?