tshile
Guest
Very good point, Mike.
 }})
-
Welcome to BGO! We know you will have questions as you become familiar with the software. Please take a moment to read our New BGO User Guide which will give you a great start. If you have questions, post them in the Feedback and Tech Support Forum, or feel free to message any available Staff Member.
where do we go from here?
- Thread starter Rymanofthenorth
- Start date
agreed, and in addition to this, Orakpo on the other side means you have to keep an RB or TE in to help on the one side or the other, thus leaving the chances for blitzes from our MLBs to get through more often... I guess statistically it doesn't seem to make a difference, but in a play calling sense i think it makes a world of difference.
Last edited:
Cycleans
The Starter
Had the NFL not imposed such a severe penalty on the Skins for exceeding the cap in an uncapped year, I'm certain some of the holes would have been filled on the roster.
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 5,705
- Reaction score
- 106
- Points
- 143
- Alma Mater
absolutely, we covered up a piss poor secondary "somewhat" in the first couple games, by being creative with blitzes, but this secondary cannot play without pressure, they simply arent that good.
I look at it like this, we will yet again have limited resources, and to spend them on players who wont be difference makers right away is a waste, I would say that our entire draft should be secondary and Oline unless somehow a first round talent falls to us and then that guy had better be a no brainer. we also had better be looking at freeagents, because this team still has a LOT of holes.
Bulldog
The Legend
Two things. First this is a rebuilding season. No one thought Griffin was going to have this fast of a start but he and Morris exceeding expectations is not going to overcome no RT, lousy special teams for the first 5 weeks, no secondary and a rash of injuries.
2. Even with limited dollars the Redskins can and should improve in the next offseason. Let's face it, we are looking at adding safeties, a lead corner, a RT and depth across the OL and WR corps.
But we have the quarterback. We have the running back. We have the left tackle. We should have back the #1 wide receiver.
Those are the money positions on offense.
Sane, smart moves in mid-tier FA and the draft should net a good GM most of what he needs to work with.
On defense I think you use that #2 pick on a corner and FA first choice money on a free safety or vice versa.
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
2. Even with limited dollars the Redskins can and should improve in the next offseason. Let's face it, we are looking at adding safeties, a lead corner, a RT and depth across the OL and WR corps.
But we have the quarterback. We have the running back. We have the left tackle. We should have back the #1 wide receiver.
Those are the money positions on offense.
Sane, smart moves in mid-tier FA and the draft should net a good GM most of what he needs to work with.
On defense I think you use that #2 pick on a corner and FA first choice money on a free safety or vice versa.
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
I'm still mad at Gary Clark for the 1986 NFC title game. He catches that damn ball down the right sideline and I'm still thinking we complete the comeback....and those "legendary" '86 Giants are just another footnote.
Grr.
Grr.
Bulldog
The Legend
actually in my experience, character is what you do after you have been knocked down to the ground 
Bounce?.............
Goaldeje
The Legend
Is that a fat joke? Uncool. I'm trying to lose the weight, but those damned chips keep calling my name.
redskins26
The Team Captain
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,607
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 68
- Military Branch
The only problem I have with Clark is he is not in the oversized orange juicer looking building
Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)
You haven't joined any rooms.