A Burgundy and Gold Obsession
Game 12 - Philly. No biggie. Just a season in the balance ...

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Disagree Disagree:  0
Post of the Year Post of the Year:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    06-30-09
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,569
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Indiana

    Default 2012 Strength of Schedule per ESPN

    ESPN posted this list of estimated strength of schedules for the NFL's 2012 season based upon the combined records of each teams upcoming opponents for the 2011 season. The column "Games versus Quality Opponents" refers to games scheduled against teams that won at least 9 games last season.



    Link to the post on ESPN's site: http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/po...th-of-schedule
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    I'm giving it a 2-4 year window. Looking for improvement in all areas. Redskins, you're on the clock.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    12-13-09
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    827
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Kent State

    Default

    The pats got a whopping 4 games against quality opponents lol
    Posted via BGO Mobile Device
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  3. #3

    Join Date
    09-20-11
    Posts
    8,920
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    George Mason

    Default

    Well, that has to do with the division you're playing. There's only 2 games on your schedule that everyone else in your division isn't playing, and aren't automatic. So... i'd venture to say they're playing garbage divisions this year.

    This 'strength of schedule' is bull**** anyways. 2-3 teams for each conference make the playoffs that didn't make it the year before. thats 4-6 teams out of a total of 12 for the whole league. part of the reason the NFL is so popular is because every year pretty much every team has a shot at doing something meaningful.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  4. #4
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-19-09
    Location
    Bethesda Md
    Posts
    6,757
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)

    Default

    nobody in today's NFL is unbeatable. there aren't any more dynasty teams out there.

    if RG III comes in here and adapts quickly to the NFL AND we get quality play out of Garcon and the other players we have added the Redskins can win any of these games.

    We can lose any as well.

    I don't expect to win both games against NY again. But I don't expect Philly to blow us out twice again either.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  5. #5
    2016 BGO Survivor Champ

    Join Date
    08-01-09
    Location
    My location
    Posts
    11,498
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Florida State

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog's Twin View Post
    there aren't any more dynasty teams out there.
    Gotta disagree with you here BT. Between the Pats, the Giants and the Steelers that is 7 of the last 11 Super Bowl victories. The Pats are definitely a dynasty, the Steeler are not far behind. But I will concede that the Giants should probably not be considered a dynasty, you could probably put the Colts in there but they only won one SB even with that string of 12 win seasons.

    It sounds a lot like the70's with the Steelers and the Cowboys, the 80's with the 49ers, Giants and the Skins or the 90's with Dallas, the 49ers and the Broncos.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    The more things change...the more they stay the same. It's like deja vu all over again.

  6. #6
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    04-01-11
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    4,738
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    3
    Army

    Default

    This is stupid the way they do it. basing it solely on the record of your opponents? They should factor in things like who those opponents beat and lost to, win and loss margin against good and bad teams, etc. In theory, a team could destroy 8 division winners, and lose by a point to a bunch of scrubs. That gives them an 8-8 record, and makes them a wash in your SOS.

    Ranking strength of schedule this way is as weak as how they rank defense. On one factor that is completely meaningless.

    I do find it strange that it seems like more often than not, New England is ranked at the bottom of the pack more often than not for SOS, and the Giants seemingly get screwed year after year.

    I'm a math nerd, always have been. I'm gonna come up with a better formula for this that would be more accurate and run it by you guys with how it would rank everyone, and see what you all think. It will take a while, but I'm bored and like stupid things like this
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    It's ok, I don't like you either.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Redskins Official 2012 Schedule
    By Boone in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-18-12, 04:46 PM
  2. Redskins 2012 Schedule
    By servumtuum in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-02-12, 02:34 PM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •