A Burgundy and Gold Obsession
Kneel before Sod

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Disagree Disagree:  0
Post of the Year Post of the Year:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    09-01-11
    Location
    Odenton
    Posts
    59
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    St. Mary's

    Default Quick rules question on what seemed odd to me

    In the Eagles game last night, there was a play where two flags were thrown.

    A defensive off sides was called, and Matt Ryan was called for intentional grounding. Leaving off the fact he was outside the pocket when one rewatched the replay, how can the offense be faulted for throwing the ball away because the defense left before the snap? As I was watching, I saw Philly get a free shot on Matt Ryan without having to take the penalty yards.

    It just seemed like a crappy call sequence, but I wasn't sure if I was understanding everything.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  2. #2
    2016 BGO Survivor Champ

    Join Date
    08-01-09
    Location
    My location
    Posts
    11,491
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Florida State

    Default

    I know exactly what play you are talking about and I was thinking the same thing. Why didn't the offside play trump any subsequent penalty if it trumps any play unless the offense chooses to take the penalty? Free play, except when there is a penalty?

    I also saw the play where Matt Ryan was hit and there was no call. I immediately thought about the BS call on Abraham when he tapped Vick.

    I swear the NFL has handed down "quiet" mandates on certain players who seem to create more revenue.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    The more things change...the more they stay the same. It's like deja vu all over again.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    13,516
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Florida Atlantic

    Default

    In the event of a defensive offsides, the offense gets a "free play" in the sense that the defense can't do anything negative to their yardage; e.g. a sack yards would not count against the team.

    However, the team can't "cheat" to take advantage of this free play, meaning its not a 100% free pass. If this were the case, they could just forward pass down the field, for instance. Or the non-ball carriers could just block in the back at will.

    The penalties still should have offset, meaning neither team got an advantage. If they enforced the intentional grounding, then you've got me.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  4. #4
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    09-01-11
    Location
    Odenton
    Posts
    59
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    St. Mary's

    Default

    They didn't enforce the grounding in terms of taking yards away. They said the penalties offset. My problem is with the intentional grounding happening as a result of the pass rusher being offsides. Isn't that supposed to be unabated to the QB? Otherwise, why not simply take the offsides 5 yards in exchange for a hit on the QB.

    It just seemed odd. Ryan started the play running for his life, and on replay he was outside the tackles (a miracle missed by the ref who called intentional grounding), but he was still called for intentional grounding. It just seemed a twice blown call.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  5. #5

    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    13,516
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Florida Atlantic

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gbear View Post
    They didn't enforce the grounding in terms of taking yards away. They said the penalties offset. My problem is with the intentional grounding happening as a result of the pass rusher being offsides. Isn't that supposed to be unabated to the QB? Otherwise, why not simply take the offsides 5 yards in exchange for a hit on the QB.

    It just seemed odd. Ryan started the play running for his life, and on replay he was outside the tackles (a miracle missed by the ref who called intentional grounding), but he was still called for intentional grounding. It just seemed a twice blown call.
    Yeah, if the guy was offsides and then came unblocked at Ryan, that seems like it should have been unabated. Probably just a blown call; seemed like a lot of those this week.

    Sproles' TD against Chicago
    Hernandez's TD against San Diego

    I'm honestly surprised that the refs got the fumble call correct to end the game against AZ.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  6. #6
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    04-30-11
    Location
    DMV
    Posts
    198
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Miami

    Default

    Ugh. The NFL is quickly becoming the NBA & FIFA in regards to rules & officiating.

    I don't care how you slice it. If the ball touches the ground, it's NOT a catch. Control/not control isn't the issue. In fact, if you had THAT much control, it wouldn't have touched the ground in the first place!

    I think it's somehow related to gambling and being able to effect the game more directly, but don't ask me to prove that. It's just a suspicion, like hoffa being buried in the bleachers or Versace (Gianni, not Dick) being offed for being a stooley.

    I'd say at least three times a game I'm in complete disagreement with not only the refs, but the rules they are enforcing....

    Between that and Fantasy Football, I'm closer to quitting than ever before.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    “There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequals.”
    - Lombardi

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Quick question for those in the know
    By Burgundy Burner in forum The 5 O'Clock Club
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-30-11, 09:42 AM
  2. New Australian Rules football broadcast deal signed.
    By SkinnedAussie in forum The 5 O'Clock Club
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-11, 04:15 AM
  3. Zorn doesn't play by conventional rules
    By brandies in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-25-09, 08:11 PM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •