A Burgundy and Gold Obsession
Is it August yet?

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Disagree Disagree:  0
Post of the Year Post of the Year:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-16-09
    Location
    CTU
    Posts
    3,081
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Air Force

    Default Sally Jenkins Not everything's clear when it comes to HGH, PRP

    Pretty good article. I remember a few years ago when Stallone got busted going into Thailand with this stuff enroute to filming the last Rambo movie. He said it had so many positive benefits everyone should do it

    Anyway

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...051904705.html

    The bottle-boyish doctor Anthony Galea has been charged with peddling syringe cocktails to some of our most prominent American athletes. His trial will be a good thing -- not for a certain Washington Redskin, or for Tiger Woods and Alex Rodriguez, whose reputations are bound to take further hits for being mixed up with him, but for the rest of us, who will be forced to ask ourselves a difficult question: What's the difference between doping and therapy?
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    Formerly known as ...............Sarge

  2. #2

    Join Date
    06-30-09
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,569
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Indiana

    Default

    Excellent point, Sarge. You know I tend to follow the state-of-the-art research in medicine, among other things, and this brings to mind questions such as, what happens when currently-in-trial, or, in the lab, treatments for re-growth of tendons, bone, muscle, or skin as part of the healing process are utilized in a sports environment?

    Some procedures in testing or clinical trials right now will cause the injured area, such as bone or muscle tissue, or ligament to become stronger than it was prior to the injury. Will we then ban such treatments for professional athletes because it's considered an "unfair advantage" even if it is shown to both speed up healing as well as leave the injured part stronger than before? The question has even arisen of the possibility of a deliberately induced bone-breakage, for example, in order to utilize a treatment that will result in stronger bone structure. These may not be very comfortable scenarios for various reasons, but these things are in the med-science pipeline and these types of questions are coming. It would seem that it isn't too early to start thinking about coming up with some answers and or guidelines, otherwise situations like we have with Dr. Galea and the patients in question will be popping up every time we turn around.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    I'm giving it a 2-4 year window. Looking for improvement in all areas. Redskins, you're on the clock.

  3. #3
    kirbster
    Honored Guest

    Default

    This is a debate that needs to happen now and hopefully come to some resolution.

    Sally has another good article today that follows up on this issue:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...052104286.html

    While NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is considering whether to suspend players for seeking cures from the syringe-wielding physician Anthony Galea, he should ask why so many of them distrust their team physicians and seek alternative ways to heal. Medical care in the league is not a simple issue. Anyone who says otherwise should read up on O.J. McDuffie's case.


    Two weeks ago former Miami Dolphins wide receiver McDuffie was awarded $11.5 million by a jury because his team physician turned a toe injury into a career-ender. Let's be honest: NFL players suffer extremes of pain, and it's considered perfectly okay for league doctors to mask it. Yet Santana Moss faces a penalty for seeking an injection that was not numbing but potentially restorative to the bum knee he has been playing on for three years. What sense does that make?
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  4. #4
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-21-09
    Location
    Salisbury, Md.
    Posts
    171
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Yeah the NFL may just be on the wrong side of this one. Hard for me to see the justification of the injection of pain killers to mask injury and yet injections to actually help heal the injury is wrong. Havin' a little trouble with that.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  5. #5
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-22-09
    Posts
    57
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    I'm stunned. Sally Jenkins has always struck me as someone unfamiliar with nuance; she generally grabs some plausible but obvious thesis, then trots out some formulaic tripe. This, however, seems thoughtful and appropriately equivocal.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  6. #6

    Join Date
    06-30-09
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    3,569
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Indiana

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by romberjo View Post
    I'm stunned. Sally Jenkins has always struck me as someone unfamiliar with nuance; she generally grabs some plausible but obvious thesis, then trots out some formulaic tripe. This, however, seems thoughtful and appropriately equivocal.
    Somewhere hereabouts I did a post one time stating my distaste for the concept of "consider the source"; that is, automatically rejecting-or accepting-something simply because of who said it, because it can potentially cause the omission of relevant and accurate information. This may serve as a case in point.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    I'm giving it a 2-4 year window. Looking for improvement in all areas. Redskins, you're on the clock.

  7. #7
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-22-09
    Posts
    57
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by servumtuum View Post
    Somewhere hereabouts I did a post one time stating my distaste for the concept of "consider the source"; that is, automatically rejecting-or accepting-something simply because of who said it, because it can potentially cause the omission of relevant and accurate information. This may serve as a case in point.
    I agree; willingness to consider ideas, independent of their source, is an excellent benchmark for thoughtfulness.

    I do note, though, that there's a difference b/w "all of Cerrato's personnel moves were bad and stupid" or "everything Gibbs [or whoever] did was brilliant," as opposed to "Jenkins is consistently not nuanced or insightful." Few (if any) of us really knows enough to be able to assess the wisdom of Gibbs' (or even Cerrato's) moves with great confidence, whereas I think many of us are able to assess the wisdom of various columnists' ruminations and pontifications.

    And Jenkins' consistent "consider the source" unabashed bashing of everything Snyder did was a big part of what led me (presumptively, but not closed-mindedly) not to think very highly of her work.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

 

 

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •