A Burgundy and Gold Obsession
Game 12 - Philly. No biggie. Just a season in the balance ...

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Disagree Disagree:  0
Post of the Year Post of the Year:  0
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1

    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    13,516
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Florida Atlantic

    Default NFL Fanhouse: Redskins still in play for Bradford

    Sam Bradford will be the No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft on Thursday night. The Rams will select the former Oklahoma QB first overall, and the likelihood is that he will wear a Rams uniform in 2010. However, that last part is not 100 percent certain just yet. Sources told FanHouse on Wednesday night that the Washington Redskins are still in discussions with the Rams and trying to make a deal for Bradford, who would then sit for a year in Washington behind Donovan McNabb and develop under new Redskins coach Mike Shanahan.

    One of the sources said that Washington was the only team still in the mix to trade for Bradford, who has told the Rams he won't sign a contract until after he is drafted. The Seattle Seahawks and Cleveland Browns -- two teams that had interest in Bradford -- are no longer making the effort to try to trade up and get him. And the gathering strength of Stan Kroenke's Rams ownership bid may alleviate the financial concerns that have threatened the Rams' ability or willingness to sign Bradford, meaning they might just draft him and keep him. But as of Wednesday night, even with McNabb on board, the offensive line a lingering concern and no picks in the second or third rounds, the Redskins were apparently still working on a way to come away with the draft's biggest QB prize.

    What the Redskins would have to surrender in such a deal (in addition to their current pick, which is No. 4 overall) is unclear. Washington has some current players it has been trying to trade, such as DT Albert Haynesworth, safety LaRon Landry and deposed starting QB Jason Campbell. The Redskins could conceivably package one or more of those players along with their first-round pick in a deal for Bradford. Such a deal would only seem to make sense for the Rams if they're not sold on Bradford or don't want to give him the contract he's seeking (more than the $41.7 million guaranteed that last year's No. 1 pick, Matthew Stafford, got from the Lions).
    http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2010/04/22/s...-for-bradford/
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  2. #2
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-16-09
    Location
    CTU
    Posts
    3,080
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Air Force

    Default

    Ill be glad when the draft is over
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    Formerly known as ...............Sarge

  3. #3

    Vescere bracis meis

    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Mechanicsville, VA
    Posts
    807
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    VCU

    Default

    Hmmmm….I’m not sure if I buy this.

    For the sake of argument let’s look at why it doesn’t make sense for us. We loose a starting DT, Safety and last years starting QB to gain a guy who is going to have to sit on the bench for the next 3-4 years because we now have McNabb. Meanwhile we pay him 45-47 million guaranteed. That makes no sense to me at all.

    I guess you can make the argument that McNabb’s deal hasn’t been extended yet, but renting him for a year would turn the good deal we made to get him in the first place into a disaster. Trade McNabb to the Rams and swap first round picks? No, that doesn’t seem likely either.

    After writing these past few sentences I’m going to change my mind to doubting this to just calling BS outright.
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin.
    H. L. Mencken

  4. #4

    Join Date
    04-11-09
    Location
    Greensboro, NC
    Posts
    17,843
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    94
    Marine Corps Virginia

    Default

    If you think Bradford is a franchise QB, it makes all the sense in the world. If you don't, it doesn't. With Snyder, the money is nearly a non-issue. Trading a guy like Haynesworth a season after acquiring him at huge expense doesn't make sense either, but you have to believe the Redskins have at least considered doing it, given all of the rumors to that effect.

    I believe we have had these discussions. But I don't think we have the juice to pull it off. Hell - I'd give them Landry, Haynesworth, Campbell, and I'd throw Portis in as a bonus for a shot at Bradford. That's only because I think he's the real deal though, and having the chance to groom him behind McNabb is a winning proposition in my book. But I don't think the Rams find that kind of deal attractive enough to make it happen.

    Gonna be fun to see what happens though
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    Subscribe to our BGO Mailing List

    You ain't bonafide

  5. #5
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-16-09
    Location
    CTU
    Posts
    3,080
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Air Force

    Default

    But then the ever present question, who's our LT if we go that route?
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    Formerly known as ...............Sarge

  6. #6

    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    13,516
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Florida Atlantic

    Default

    if bernie says it..book it : RT @miklasz Nothing going on between Rams and Redskins for the No. 1 pick, sources at Rams Park tell me.
    http://twitter.com/wingoz/statuses/12642147237
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  7. #7
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    227
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    8
    VCU

    Default

    St. Louis trying to convince people there's a market for the #1 pick, when in actuality, I seriously doubt there is. My guess is we're trying to go the other way and trade back.

    Or ... we're trying to package something up to get the #33 from the Rams, which to me, makes much more sense. It might be one of those things where if say, hypothetically, off the top of my head, Colt McCoy was available with that pick, we give up Fat Albert, Campbell, and Carter, but we're waiting to see how round 1 plays out before we do.

    11:10. This is going to be the longest, most unproductive day of work ever lol.

    Edit: Oh boy....
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  8. #8
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    2,128
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)

    Default

    The rumor I heard a little while ago from a friend in St. Louis (his brother-in-law works for the Rams) was Haynesworth, Campbell and the Skins pick at #4 for the #1 pick but Rams want more. OUCH!!! Praying we don't do that.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  9. #9

    Join Date
    06-30-09
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,086
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    25

    Default

    Words from agents don't impress me. They are interested in one thing . . . making money for their client (and hence, themselves).
    0 0 0 0
     
     
    Subscribe to our BGO Mailing List

    hailus redskinus
    COYS

  10. #10
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    227
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    8
    VCU

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    The rumor I heard a little while ago from a friend in St. Louis (his brother-in-law works for the Rams) was Haynesworth, Campbell and the Skins pick at #4 for the #1 pick but Rams want more. OUCH!!! Praying we don't do that.
    I'm hardly an expert is assessing the value of picks, but that sounds like a good deal for us if we're really sold on Bradford.

    Here's what's interesting though - St. Louis needs a QB, they've (allegedly) removed themselves from the Big Ben talk, so they must be preparing to use their #33 on a QB, right? If that's the case, they might be secretly coveting their second pick as much (if not more) their 1st, in which case we might be able to slide up there easier than we think. I don't think they want to invest that $50 million or whatever it is to sign him.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  11. #11
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    227
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    8
    VCU

    Default

    Humoring the idea this rumor is actually true, would you consider this an act of long-term planning, or an act of short-term indulgence?
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  12. #12
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    07-15-09
    Location
    The Shadows of the Unknown
    Posts
    952
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Blog Entries
    16
    Navy Salisbury

    Default

    Smokescreens.....I love it.

    We're taking Okung, Williams, Bradford, Berry and Clausen.....heh.

    Gotta love this new administration, NOBODY has a clue what the Skins will do. At this point we're all just guessing.

    This is great. Bring on the draft!!!!!!
    0 0 0 0
     
     

  13. #13
    BGObsessed
    Join Date
    04-02-10
    Location
    Hershey, PA
    Posts
    152
    Post Responses
    Thanks, Likes, & More
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
    The rumor I heard a little while ago from a friend in St. Louis (his brother-in-law works for the Rams) was Haynesworth, Campbell and the Skins pick at #4 for the #1 pick but Rams want more. OUCH!!! Praying we don't do that.
    Bollocks to that.

    I'd counter with #4 and Haynesworth for #1 and #33. My fall back would be #4 and Haynesworth for #1 and #65.
    0 0 0 0
     
     

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. WPC: Is Bradford still in play for Redskins?
    By Pappas in forum Sons of Washington
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-08-10, 12:24 AM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •