fansince62
Guest
Were I Dan I'd do my business case analysis and seriously consider selling. The value of the franchsise is not going to increase over time - it's going to go South along with the rest of the NFL.
Snyder's gonna cave, because he's spineless. He thinks his wallet is gonna hurt over the sponsorship deals being pulled, but hasn't even considered how much a name change will hurt his wallet.
Kal...not attacking you...but where exactly does this notion that if a group is offended they can obliterate language come from?
If the name Redskins is truly offensive to them and causes great pain to Native Americans, then I think we should be considerate of that. But I don't know if we will ever get to that point because other than a few that confirm someone's bias, Native Americans aren't allowed to speak. People are speaking for them despite evidence to the contrary that they don't find it offensive. That's my point. Let's hear from them, and not just a select few. I want to know if this name causes pain and why it does. We may actually learn something and it may not be what we want to hear or it may not be what the know-it-all outragers want to hear. And the latter is why I think they won't let them speak.
I get your point. Again, not attacking you personnaly. I find the idea objectionable. It has no foundation. It ends up with idiotic contradictions like the N-word where it is offensive, but exceptions are made for one group of people in their music, literature, movies, etc. It's an inherently relative, transitory concept. In the future, will it be ok, for example, if I author a play cataloguing all the racist offenses (real and imagined) of America to use Redskins in the play? Point being that this ventures into very dangerous territory - intent. One can only use approved language based on intent? See where this leads? And don't kid yourself, that's a prime mover behind all of this.
I think that might be a little simplistic Bob. Which Native Americans, and how many of them have to be offended before the team is forced to change the name? Isn't that how they've approached it to date (perhaps not as comprehensively as you're describing, but that is what they've done to an extent). There's no way a) that will suffice in the eyes of critics and sponsors, and b) there's no way said critics/sponsors will desist until the name is changed.What I would like to see:
In light of what is happening around the nation, I would like to see an open, honest and public dialog about the name with as much of the Native American population as is feasible. I really don't think anyone else needs be involved either, other than to watch and learn. Once the conversation has been had and all opinions heard, a decision can be made. Put simply, give Native Americans the last word and be done with it. If they are good with the name, everyone else should be too. If they are not good with the name, then the team and the fans should be good with a change. I don't see this as the business of the NFL, other teams, sponsors or media.
I know polls have been done and the number favor the Skins keeping the name. In at least one case, overwhelmingly so. I also know the sources of those polls has an agenda and was stunned when the data didn't support their position. I feel like that should tell us something but I would also like to see an independent body run a larger poll, perhaps even a formal referendum, among Native Americans that will put paid to this issue one way or the other for the balance of my lifetime.
The stadium has been half empty because the on-the-field product was horrible and we fired an inept coach mid-season. People are tired of rooting for a crap team. Obviously the talent level is improving and we have a promising young team now with a 2nd year 1st round QB and a whole new coaching staff. I know the theory is that all the fans will walk away over this if it goes down. I think ultimately a small % will walk away, but not nearly the numbers who have said they'll be done. It is still the same team and organization with all of it's history, good and bad. Realistically a name change can't wipe all that out. Snyder is not selling though - that's a pipe dream brother.How much a name change will hurt his wallet? It can't get any worse. The stadium is already empty and many have already given up. It would be great if we could get him to sell now too and really start fresh.
There are some talking about changing the colors too. So if they change the name and the colors, they will effectively wipe the team from existence and in that instance, there will be no way that it's the same team,history etc.The stadium has been half empty because the on-the-field product was horrible and we fired an inept coach mid-season. People are tired of rooting for a crap team. Obviously the talent level is improving and we have a promising young team now with a 2nd year 1st round QB and a whole new coaching staff. I know the theory is that all the fans will walk away over this if it goes down. I think ultimately a small % will walk away, but not nearly the numbers who have said they'll be done. It is still the same team and organization with all of it's history, good and bad. Realistically a name change can't wipe all that out. Snyder is not selling though - that's a pipe dream brother.
My only hope at this point? Please don't change the name to something stupid (and most of the suggestions I've seen are stupid).
You haven't joined any rooms.