Burner's Burning Questions: An Open Letter To Mike Florio

Burner

More...

Burner’s Burning Questions – An Open Letter To Mike Florio

Mr. Florio, greetings from our humble football home on this vast expanse that we know as the internet. We’re a small group of dedicated Redskins fans who enjoy talking about our favorite team and, win or lose, do so with a passionate zeal. Many in our membership base will tell you that we are open minded and welcome all newcomers with a unique blend of enthusiasm and hospitable warmth.

With that in mind, we would like to extend an invitation to answer a few questions via one of our fan based blogs, Burner’s Burning Questions – a weekly interactive feature that poses questions to our membership. For this week, the BBQ blog would like to step out of its comfortable settings and invite you to be a part of our Q and A. In light of recent articles via your site (ProFootballTalk.com), the focus of our conversation will center on the team name. The popular moniker has certainly come under fire from your web site and from other media outlets. With this in mind, we are not seeking a heated confrontation or a shouting match, just a brief dialogue where you will be treated with the utmost respect and dignity.


1. You often cite Oneida Nation as the one Native American tribe who is seemingly united against the team name. In all honesty, is this the only tribe that objects and if so, why are the others refusing to take such a stand?

2. Staying with the Oneida, the protest against the Redskins drew somewhere between nine and thirteen participants (depending on media reports) to the early season game at Lambeau field against the Packers. Some reports have intimated that Ray Halbritter is not the preferred representative of the Oneida people and that he is an Ivy League educated entrepreneur who has taken on this task due to his wealth. Too, many in the Oneida Nation consider him to be a "fake chief". Could it be that he is simply looking for financial gain at the expense of his tribe and is PFT willing to do a true and thorough investigation to see if this is the case?

3. Which is better and more important - dropping the team name because some find it offensive or focusing/dealing with issues in the Native American tribes such as extreme poverty, lack of educational resources, severe drug abuse, alcoholism, infant mortality, suicide rates, teenage pregnancy, housing shortages, discord within tribes (i.e., the enormous gap between wealthy leaders and members), and lack of health/mental health facilities?

4. Considering the aforementioned question, if team names that feature Native Americans are discarded, do we run the risk of forgetting and ignoring their many issues altogether?

5. The common argument for discarding the name is that it is racist. However, there are reservations where the local high school team uses the name freely and openly. The common argument is that this is their right, but non-Native teams should not be afforded that opportunity. If this is truly the case, then is a school or university in a predominantly African American community allowed to use the “n-word” as their nickname? If not, then should the same type of requirement be extended to Native American schools?

Mr. Florio, we hope you will take the time to answer these questions without bias and political persuasion. If you desire to have a follow up session with our site membership, we will be glad to extend that courtesy to you. All interaction will be professional and without malice. Thank you for taking the time to read these questions and taking our offer into consideration.

Burner’s Burning Questions at BGO
Burgundy Burner

Very nice BB, you definitely have a way with words.

Thanks for the kind words. I doubt this will go anywhere, but you never know.

Burgundy Burner said:

Thanks for the kind words. I doubt this will go anywhere, but you never know.

Click to expand...

I'll be very interested to hear any response, honestly.

You will get no response. Douche boy Florio is using this as his journalistic cause, something to feel as if he has purpose. Because basically he is just know for plagiarism and linking other people's work. He is the Drudge Report of football news. If the name change happens, he will feel as if he was one of the catalysts for the change, and thus his fragile little mind will sleep better at night.

I think he IS at the root of this movement. He's at NBC spots and tight with King and Costas and the rest of the yutzes in the media who are behind this and I think they took his ball and ran with it. He NEVER has the balls to equally represent both sides in this argument, he tells a decidedly one sided version of things and leaves out pretty much anything that negates his take. I'll be STUNNED if he even responds.

We will see if he does respond. No guarantees though. I agree that he is the lead spokesperson at NBC on this issue or at the very least, he is the most vocal and visible.

Very well done, BB. I doubt Florio will respond. You made too many good and well thought out questions.

I have sent a tweet to PFT and ask if he would do the Q and A. True, he may not answer, but you never know until you try.

If he does reply, let's keep it classy and professional. Please?

Quick update...

More than two days later, still no word. I'll give it up to a week. If there is no answer, I will give a commentary next week on this matter via a new BBQ blog. I would not presume to speak for Mr. Florio, but a follow up will occur - with or without him. I hope it is the former.