Likely Mass Voter Fraud In Philly To Be Ignored Completely

Extreme · 11-12-12, 09:05 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...-for-obama-in/

Gee guys, I can hardly believe it.

And you know damn well it isn't the only place this bs happened.

MikeSr619 · 11-12-12, 09:14 PM

also, this.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...perts-say.html

remember how "outraged" the left was about the CRAAAAAAAAZY voting machines forcing them to pick Romney even though they chose Obama?

MikeSr619 · 11-12-12, 09:15 PM

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...-registrations

tshile · 11-12-12, 09:26 PM

Guess that voter ID stuff worked well.

MikeSr619 · 11-12-12, 09:29 PM

seems like the states that Romney won forced the voter ID law.

tshile · 11-12-12, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeSr619

seems like the states that Romney won forced the voter ID law.

The state this thread is about had voter ID.....
In fact, it was one of the reasons listed for why Romney was supposed to win PA.

Edit: whoops nvm. Looks like that was put on hold for this election. My bad.

Burgundy Burner · 11-12-12, 09:54 PM

For many years, this area has known about the illegal Philly operations. It's just a way of life for them - that is why I posted the other day about taking Philly out of the equation and PA is a very red state.

On election day, dem operatives forced republican monitors away from voting stations around Philly (PA requires both sides to present all day during an election) - some very physically so. It took about four hours for a PA court order from Harrisburg to get the monitors back to the stations, but the damage was done.

I have no doubt that African-American totals for the president was more than 95% across the nation - but that is based on realistic turnouts. However, to have 90% turnouts (or more) in any precinct voting that day is not realistic. The norm in Philly has been (historically) 60% in presidential elections.

It took many years to learn about how the Chicago vote went for Kennedy in a similar fashion back in 1960. Over a period of time, the world came to know that Joseph P. Kennedy bankrolled that operation. How many years will it take to learn of massive fraud in this election? Who do you think is at the core of this fraud?

tshile · 11-12-12, 10:47 PM

BB do you really believe the fraud is more prevalent on one side than the other?

I've read quite a few alarming observations about voter turnout in key demographics/areas from this past election. Please do not misunderstand me; I'm well aware that voter fraud is alive and well in the good old US of A.

It just seems that a post like that suggests that you believe one side has much more involvement in the fraud than the other and it makes me curious.

Burgundy Burner · 11-12-12, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tshile

BB do you really believe the fraud is more prevalent on one side than the other?

Yes. Which party supported the ID laws and which one wanted to oppose such laws? Joseph P. would be proud.

tshile · 11-13-12, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burgundy Burner

Yes. Which party supported the ID laws and which one wanted to oppose such laws? Joseph P. would be proud.

The Republicans support them and the democrats oppose them.

Does this mean you think the majority of voter fraud is done by people walking into polling places and claiming they are someone they're not?

Lanky Livingston · 11-13-12, 08:31 AM

So, "suspicious" turnout in Philly (where Obama was expected to crush Romney anyway), bloated voter registration rolls in Ohio (that COULD lead to voter fraud, you guys) and a picture of some shredded paper in a closed garbage bag that some concerned citizen just HAPPENED to notice outside of a CVP office, THROUGH the garbage bag, and a photo of a pile of shredded paper.

The right is really grasping at straws here.

Sarge · 11-13-12, 08:40 AM

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/10/2...itted-in-ohio/

Update: Human Events has learned that there is a Republican interpreter for Somali voters at the at the Morse Road early voter center and has modified the story.

—

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Two volunteer poll workers at an Ohio voting station told Human Events that they observed van loads of Ohio residents born in Somalia — the state is home to the second-largest Somali population in the United States — being driven to the voting station and guided by Democratic interpreters on the voting process. No Republican interpreters were present, according to these volunteers.

While it’s not unusual for get-out-the-vote groups to help voters get to the polls, the volunteers who talked to Human Events observed a number of troubling and questionable activities.

A source, who wishes to remain anonymous, is a volunteer outside the Morse Road polling center. She has witnessed Somalis who cannot speak English come to the polling center. They are brought in groups, by van or bus. The Democrats hand them a slate card and say, “vote Brown all the way down.” Given that Sherrod Brown is the incumbent Democrat Senator in Ohio, one can assume that this is the reference.

Extreme · 11-13-12, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tshile

BB do you really believe the fraud is more prevalent on one side than the other?

It's easy to make this observation. Growing up, CNN was all there was for 24 hour news. They constantly talked about it. It isn't made up by the right. And while we're all aware both sides cheat, until evidence starts coming out decade after decade of massive scale fraud by the right, it's safe to assume the sides aren't comparable in their level of cheating.

Extreme · 11-13-12, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lanky Livingston

So, "suspicious" turnout in Philly (where Obama was expected to crush Romney anyway), bloated voter registration rolls in Ohio (that COULD lead to voter fraud, you guys) and a picture of some shredded paper in a closed garbage bag that some concerned citizen just HAPPENED to notice outside of a CVP office, THROUGH the garbage bag, and a photo of a pile of shredded paper.

The right is really grasping at straws here.

Grasping at straws huh? Look at the numbers Lanky. Those fraudulent Philly results gave the state to Obama. While winning Pennsylvania wouldn't matter after looking at the map, it's also a safe assumption this wasn't an isolated event. Are we really to believe that in an election with the lowest voter turnout in 12 years, major cities were showing record smashing turnout? Are all the cities showing more votes than registered voters grasping at straws? That's not COULD lead to fraud, that's DID lead to fraud.

Lanky Livingston · 11-13-12, 08:55 AM

Alternatively, the cities (which are heavily Democrat, btw) DID have massive turnout to support Obama, and the suburbs/rural areas did not turn out to support their mediocre nominee. There's a reason Romney got 2M less votes than McCain did...

Also, its not a safe assumption that this wasn't an isolated event, because we don't even know if it was an event. So, you're taking numbers that COULD suggest something, and extrapolating them to everywhere else. Aka, grasping at straws.